presidence99

yeah, I saw it. I'm sure something was said like "even Seifert won the first one, 0-16 this year"

if you are, they'd need to invent a new word for me
oh
and
ROSARIO CAUGHT HIS DAMMIT

I do feel better. Not a moral victory guy or anything, but we had two ugly divisional losses last year. At least we fought in this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTdwmtNCfVU

Definitely. But you'll have that Thigpen, Tebow thing out there.
Luckily, regardless of everyone giving up on our QB or our coach, the keys are there that someone will have to stay with a traditional run game.

[IMG]

you'd figure that the emergence of so many great backs, including so many great two-back offenses, would keep so much of this goddamned gimmickry out of the NFL, but here we go with everyone wanting to be wildcat. Bill Parcells drafted a wildcat QB. In the second fucking round. Bill Parcells. Michael Vick - well, that's going to make this bad enough.
That's only going to get worse with the white-boy hype that's going to go all apeshit with Thigpen and Tebow doing this stuff, and all the spread offense guys out there. Can't have that.

**** that shit.

Just line up and beat the guy across from you.

NOBODY LIKES MY IDEAS ANYMORE.

yeah, I could see a Snyder-GHammer correlation. Still no idea how the Redskins haven't folded as a franchise. But they have a businessman there, and somehow he finds a way to field mediocre teams that have tons of preseason promise.

And besides his infalliability, having Cowher's old lackeys out there isn't, to me, a selling point. Going and getting Gailey, Haslett isn't that appetizing. I think they'd go get Grimm instead of Chin anyway.

people have all the answers right now. It's funny how much more people know when the team is playing poorly than when they're playing well. Campbell is a solid player - better than Delhomme? Don't know. Everyone throws Jake away like he's always this one game. Campbell was so good the team that has him doesn't want him. He won't have a problem starting for years. If teams are happy with him as he is, they're going to be in good shape. I'm good for that much, I don't think we need a superstar. People are fooling themselves that bigger star means more like what we need.

At any rate, we'd also have to gut a good portion of one of the younger and more talented teams, finishing with not actually improving the DL. People who keep talking about spanky new coaches won't be happy when 2/3rds of the roster including their favorite scrubs aren't with us in two years.

Even saw the "if they won't play Moore before Feeley, it won't matter, Fox won't be there either"