Yahoo Sports is Saying Stephen Jackson is Gone...

i guess when you can't win the actual argument, you just make up a new one.

and for what it's worth, i stand by my statement that rose on the same team they had last year with the same coach would not have gotten to 62 games and would probably be somewhere south of 50. i'm sure you have the understanding of nba basketball to actually debate that point, right? or are you just going to run around in circles posting the same thing over and over?

 

I not only made you look like a fucking retard, but also a dishonest coward. You keep vacillating between saying that Rose wasn't responsible for the team's improvement and insisting that you actually said he was a major factor. In the future, when arguing with me just tuck your tail and cry uncle instead of dragging this out. Regardless of how intelligent you think you are, you're always going to lose these arguments when you can't keep your story straight.

 

In the order of importance IMO to the Bulls improvement

1. Rose
2. Thib
3. and then Boozer

Boozer should have been taken out of the starting lineup. Gibson was out playing him

 

This one...right at the bottom.

http://thisboardrocks.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2645491&postcount=52

I thought the point you were making was that building through the draft wouldn't work, you had to attract top flight free agents in order to be successful.

 

clearly, to you everybody looks like a dishonest coward and fucking retard. but that's really more about your own psychosis more than reality.

i've stated multiple time that rose's improvement was a major factor in the bulls improvement last year. i've also stated that he alone was probably not enough to break the 50 win mark. those two statements are not exclusive of each other.

 

yes, that was pretty much the point. i didn't mean to imply that rose's improvement was not important to the team, which is why i made sure to specifically state so in subsequent posts. i guess i read your "largely" to be at the exclusion of rose, which isn't exactly what you had stated.

 

i think you're dramatically undervaluing boozer's contribution to the team. if thibobeau's coaching is truly the 2nd most important factor in the bull's leap from mediocre to elite, then it seems odd to question his lineup decisions.

 

Lulu Dung's improved four-point shooting, three throw prowess and stingy perimeter "D" is clearly the second-greatest contributing factor (behind only Carlos Boozer's arrival as a legitimate inside scoring option) to the Bills' success.

collin posted this very point on another board. I have no idea why he's singing a different tune here.

 

Dude, I'm not the only one calling you out on your bullshit. Spare yourself further embarrassment and stop posting in this thread.


Once more with feeling:

 

you think some anonymous nitwit on a bulletin board is capable of embarrassing me? man, you must have quite the fragile ego.

we get it. you think i'm an idiot. move along.