We have got to give Fasani a shot!!!

Sorry, Fasani looked way too much like Craig in preseason. Oh, wait, it's the team's fault Craig went under, they kept him on the bench so long he got rusty. Damn. Now the same thing's gonna happen to Fasani.

 

You kids are funny... I have not brought Craig up since the off season... its funny how people insecure with their beliefs bring up things un related to the conversation to have something to say...

MvM... you're funny... Its the first smile I've had since Dallas started their comeback today...

Edit- Fasani was credited for winning a preseason game for us and almost won the other...

 

You aren't that much older. More senile, yep. So shut the kid stuff, troll.

 

You're right... I just can't find another word for people that refuse to talk "subjects" or points. They instead try to support their opinon with weak attempts at making others look bad. No one's trolling here, its you guys that bring up the past with the Craig shit...

 

You don't respond to points. You ignore them, and come back with what you said, with vauge comments.

So of course we are going to make fun of you. "nut-uh" "uh-hun" arguments are for, you know, kids.

 

except in the middle of page 3:

I'm secure in my belief that neither Peete nor Weinke is the team's principal problem, that they are "fair to middling" QB's, and that Fasani would in no way improve our offense at this time.

 

Not to bust your bubble, but it really should not be as fun for you and your little buddy. I don't feel like I'm being made fun of. I see a few insecure people insulted because logic does not always prevail. I'm very confident in things... I'm not the shy boy who wonders if he is going to get his lunch money taken. Better search elsewhere for that.

I don't ignore anything... I'm a topline guy, I don't care much for the bullshit in between. I'm results driven...

 

you're the one who keeps bringing up your "record" with opinions, so once you bring it up it's more than open game is it not? Did you not say "Craig" first? And then when it backfires on you, you get pissed off about it? If you're willing to get into your personal life as if it's important, we'll discuss that. If you want to get into the way you lucked into a Beuerlein situation, even though I remember you getting roasted for being full of shit because you had no backup on it, it's fair game, along with the way you got branded a liar.

See, you make yourself look bad. I just discuss it once you decide it's a topic. If you're going to talk out your ass to try to show someone up, you'll get called on it. No less. The fact you keep doing it over and over again either means you're not smart enough to stop or you for some reason think everyone else is too stupid to catch on.

Sure, we're being no less personal than you are. And while a few people here get frustrated by you, I don't insult you. I don't call you petty little shit like "kid" or "son". I'll tell you you're wrong when I think you are, especially if you're trying to pull something over on everyone. But that's not an insult, and yet you've complained all day - from the moment that Weinke came in - that everyone's getting down on you rather than "discussing the topic" when you're the one pushing it the way you don't want it to go.

 

I only look bad if I'm concerned about a handfull of guys on a message board that disagree with me - I'm not.

You'll discuss my personal life??? If I want??? What you think you can prove that wrong too...

Your still orgasmic about something your twin JHOP said - he was a sick phsyco... your alter ego... I'm not concerned.

Roasted??? your funny. The way I get branded a liar? You can be so childish... you've pissed off more people while I'm a sleep... not that it matters right??? Its just a message board...

 

No, you ignore most everything. God knows I'm long winded but I'll respond to whatever's being said. Hell, you even posted a quote to Piper saying "and you still haven't answered my questions." In that post, you didn't answer his questions. And then you went through the whole process again. The third time you posted a quote of four statements Piper posted, and you ignored the entire situation except the one line that mentioned Beuerlein. You ignore. That has nothing to do with being results driven, even though I'm still looking for those results from some of the players you supported...but I don't get the AFL newsletter.