1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

UNC fans crawling out from under rocks

Discussion in 'Charlotte Hornets' started by Thelt, Apr 5, 2005.

Page 23 of 32
  1. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:37 PM #221
    vpkozel

    vpkozel Professional Calvinballer

    Age:
    57
    Posts:
    35,060
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    lmfao.
     
  2. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:37 PM #222
    slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    Not as much as the refs got by handing you the game in the Dean Dome this year.
     
  3. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:38 PM #223
    slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    All most as bad as the "travelling" call on Villanova this year, wouldn't you agree?
     
  4. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:41 PM #224
    vpkozel

    vpkozel Professional Calvinballer

    Age:
    57
    Posts:
    35,060
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    No. No where close. There is absolutely no one who thinks that Laetner didn't stomp on the guy. Plenty of people think taht was a travel.
     
  5. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:43 PM #225
    slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    Laettner's foot came intentionally in contact with the guy...yes. Stomp? Hell no. There was no force or weight behind it. It was a tap with his foot. Tech worthy, not toss worthy.

    And most people who aren't unc fans think Villanova got jobbed.
     
  6. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:44 PM #226
    vpkozel

    vpkozel Professional Calvinballer

    Age:
    57
    Posts:
    35,060
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Without intent, there can be no tech.
     
  7. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:45 PM #227
    slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    thats what I said, thanks
     
  8. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:47 PM #228
    vpkozel

    vpkozel Professional Calvinballer

    Age:
    57
    Posts:
    35,060
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    No, you said it was tech worthy. That means there was intent. And with the intent to stomp the guy he should have been tossed, no questions asked.

    Thanks for playing though.
     
  9. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:53 PM #229
    slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    I said there was intent for his foot to come in contact with the guy which it did. It wasn't a stomp. Not even close.

    Your argument is like saying hand checking is a punch. However, hand checking a guy after the play is over is tech worthy.
     
  10. Apr 7, 2005 at 12:55 PM #230
    vpkozel

    vpkozel Professional Calvinballer

    Age:
    57
    Posts:
    35,060
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Hand checking after the play is not hand checking. It is a punch.
     
Page 23 of 32

Share This Page