1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Trading the #9?

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Wp28, Mar 26, 2012.

Page 1 of 6
  1. Mar 26, 2012 at 11:40 AM #1
    Wp28

    Wp28 I had that dream again...

    Age:
    60
    Posts:
    12,596
    Likes Received:
    60
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Calypso, NC
    the 9 slots sucks, anyway I look at it..

    what would be the preference if they make a trade, up - down? targets?

    looked at the trade value chart and thinking they could swap with Cleveland for the #4, would cost the Panthers the #40, probable also getting a 4th back from Cleveland.

    targeting Claiborne, hoping they're looking to drop back and Tennehill.
     
  2. Mar 26, 2012 at 11:51 AM #2
    Toll Booth Willie

    Toll Booth Willie Welcome to Wusta!

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Des Moines, IA
    If they are looking to do that, then our pick is no good. Miami has a good chance of picking him at 8.

    In general, we have too many needs to trade up I think, unless you believe Claiborne is the next Revis.
     
  3. Mar 26, 2012 at 11:59 AM #3
    finleye

    finleye como say what?

    Age:
    43
    Posts:
    984
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Location:
    Raleigh
    i think we could still trade down. it would take some team talking themselves into believing someone was worth it, and, hey, we're still a month away, plenty of time for that!
     
  4. Mar 26, 2012 at 4:22 PM #4
    The Special One

    The Special One BALL HARD UNIVERSITY

    Posts:
    1,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    If RB Richardson falls to #9 maybe the Bengals might be willing to trade up to get him.
     
  5. Mar 26, 2012 at 6:56 PM #5
    Normanator

    Normanator Full Access Member

    Posts:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2012
    Given Marty's history of trading first round picks, I would prefer to just stand pat at # 9. Just take BPA and move on. Under the new CBA its not as much of a killer from a salary cap perspective anyway.

    My gut tells me we will end up with Coples.
     
  6. Mar 26, 2012 at 7:43 PM #6
    Laceration

    Laceration Full Access Member

    Posts:
    695
    Likes Received:
    7
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    I'd like to trade down and get a S with some size and pick up a second rounder.
     
  7. Mar 26, 2012 at 9:19 PM #7
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    Or maybe we draft him to compete with DW, Stew and Tolbert.....
     
  8. Mar 27, 2012 at 12:13 AM #8
    Black&Blue_

    Black&Blue_ _

    Posts:
    7,603
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    I'd say ya'll are jolly well fucked. :retard:
     
  9. Mar 27, 2012 at 12:49 AM #9
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Or Stewart is gone on draft day and we could use a badass young RB under our control at a reasonable price.
     
  10. Mar 27, 2012 at 1:05 AM #10
    presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,522
    Likes Received:
    2,690
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Still feels like poor resource allocation.
     
Page 1 of 6

Share This Page