1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

The Davinci Code

Discussion in 'TV & Movie Discussion' started by jbghostrat, May 18, 2006.

Page 2 of 8
  1. May 18, 2006 at 12:46 PM #11
    gridfaniker

    gridfaniker Loathsome

    Age:
    59
    Posts:
    40,503
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    critics think it sucks.
     
  2. May 18, 2006 at 12:47 PM #12
    Fro

    Fro FFFFFFFFFffffffffffffffff

    Posts:
    15,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Kinda like the passion of the christ and Shaq Fu
     
    Last edited: May 18, 2006
  3. May 18, 2006 at 1:12 PM #13
    TimTam

    TimTam El Chupacabra

    Age:
    43
    Posts:
    19,636
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Location:
    Arizona Bay
    PotC was a terrible film.
     
  4. May 18, 2006 at 3:16 PM #14
    hasbeen99

    hasbeen99 Fighting the stereotype

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Clovis, CA
    There was absolutely nothing wrong with a rabbi marrying and having children in the first century, or today.

    Teej, the story is pretty decent if you think of it purely as entertainment.
     
  5. May 19, 2006 at 9:34 AM #15
    VA49er

    VA49er Full Access Member

    Posts:
    22,561
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Then it must be good.
     
  6. May 19, 2006 at 9:44 AM #16
    gridfaniker

    gridfaniker Loathsome

    Age:
    59
    Posts:
    40,503
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003

    yeah, that's usually my reaction too. If the critics think a movie is great, it's usually really bad.

    still, the reviews are so overwhelmingly on the "bad side." They're just crucifying Howard. Plus there's something about Tom Hanks with a mullett that makes me want to stay the fuck away.
     
  7. May 19, 2006 at 9:56 AM #17
    HardHarry

    HardHarry Rebel with a 401(k)

    Posts:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Location:
    Indie Kid
    Then its a damn good thing that Brown's publisher shipped eleventy million new copies to stores to capitalize on the popularity of the film. :thud:
     
  8. May 19, 2006 at 10:01 AM #18
    VA49er

    VA49er Full Access Member

    Posts:
    22,561
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    I've seen the reviews and still want to see the movie. It's rather long at over 2.5 hours. I don't really expect it to be better than the book as movies based on books rarely are. I've read where the movie has toned down Langdon and cut out completely the "sex" scene. Yea, Tom Hanks with a mullet is strange but at least they didn't cast Tom Cruise in this one.
     
  9. May 19, 2006 at 12:12 PM #19
    outofstate

    outofstate Full Access Member

    Posts:
    12,357
    Likes Received:
    304
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    I read the book and thought it was great. Definately hard to put down. I want to see the movie as well no matter what the critics say. I may wait till it comes out on video - but I want to see it.

    JB - read the book....just remember you got it in the "fiction" section of the store. It a murder mystery - who done it kind of book. Think of it like the movie National Treasure with Nick Cage......the Mason didn't really hide all that treasure either......and I heard there were a lot of people who tried looking for clue after this movie came out too.
     
  10. May 19, 2006 at 12:26 PM #20
    TimTam

    TimTam El Chupacabra

    Age:
    43
    Posts:
    19,636
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Location:
    Arizona Bay
    Audrey Tatou :woohoo:
     
Page 2 of 8

Share This Page