Teebow

accuracy is a measure of quarterbacking, and in no point did I ever say it was most important or the only thing (another thing you lied about, since we talked about QBR, turnovers, among other things). You don't have that, and you never will. It does matter, however, and 48% is awful. Now you can pull your usual bullshit, and you always do, but 48% is not good enough in any offense. Now quote me again and pretend it means something new.

 

You brought up completion percentage as the definition of what it means to be a "good quarterback." Quoted for the infinith time:

 

I said what you quoted. You're just trying to make it say something it doesn't. Just like you did when you said I "bashed" Tebow, "praised" Skelton by saying he was winning and that I liked him in the draft, or said that completion percentage

, in your words.

But, fine, whatever - none of these semantic little wordplay arguments you love change whether 48% is good enough, whether Tebow is playing well enough to be the most talked about thing in the entire league, or whether it's hilarious that you have to dog also-rans like Skelton to try to improve his image.

 

Again, Eli Manning completed 48% over his first nine starts. And for future reference, when you say something is "the definition," that means it's really important. Since you apparently didn't know that, you can now avoid such confusion in the future.

 

never said "the definition" either, and Eli was really shitty as a rookie. Even Clausen was 52%.

 

Has any one of these endless bitch-fests ever concluded with, "you were right, I apologize"?

 

Clearly, that is a rhetorical question.

 

48% is terrible by 2011 standards. I do admire his knack for making clutch plays. That whole team has had a ton of good breaks, though. If the Broncos were in the AFC North, they would probably have a losing record

 

It's also worth noting that Denver is 27th in 3rd down conversations, at 32%. In the four games that Orton started and finished, Denver was 45%.

 

Tim is a man of few words.