1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Sports Center ranking the positions

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Wp28, Jun 25, 2006.

Page 3 of 6
  1. Jun 26, 2006 at 5:07 PM #21
    Wp28

    Wp28 I had that dream again...

    Age:
    60
    Posts:
    12,596
    Likes Received:
    60
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Calypso, NC
    They're doing the RB's tonight. Somebody watch it and post the results. I'm really curious where we end up.

    they have 65 positions total they're going to do then do some kind of playoff system to determine their SB champion based on depth.

    I know it sucks but we got nothing else to rant about.
     
  2. Jun 26, 2006 at 5:11 PM #22
    PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,058
    Likes Received:
    2,783
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    Any team that has a former full time starter in the number 2 spot. Not someone like Jamie Martin in St Louis who just got a couple of games in when Bulger got hurt again. Also Harrington on clip board in Miami doesn't count. He sucked in Detroit. Scratching my head. What other team has a former number one as their number 2 guy now?

    • Minnesota had Johnson behind Culpepper
     
  3. Jun 26, 2006 at 5:22 PM #23
    HAVEPSL

    HAVEPSL Full Access Member

    Age:
    74
    Posts:
    2,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Some Beach
    I guess with McNair in Bal., Boller is a pretty good #2.

    Besides Martin in SL, Fitzpatrick had 194 ypg in a few games.

    McCown, Griese, and Garrard are pretty fair #2's.

    The Warner/Leinart combo shouldn't be too bad, and there is a 4 way competition for the Jets' #1.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2006
  4. Jun 26, 2006 at 5:51 PM #24
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    As far as the first two on the depth chart, I don't believe anyone with a guy who's never taken an NFL snap should be in the top echelon.
     
  5. Jun 26, 2006 at 6:50 PM #25
    Black&Blue

    Black&Blue NKW

    Age:
    79
    Posts:
    20,190
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    New Orleans has build up a lot of offensive depth. Things are going good when you can sign one of the better RB's in free agency, then place him on the trading block after the draft. And they still have Stecker, who is very good on special teams and in the 3rd down role.
     
  6. Jun 26, 2006 at 7:02 PM #26
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    All this list making is pretty pointless. It does not really mean anything to be the deepest at any one position. What matters is being balanced and good in all areas and excellent in at least one. I would put our balance up against most anyone in the league. I can not think of another team that is as good in all areas as we are. Pass defense, rush defense, passing offense and maybe now with Williams rushing offense should all be good.
     
  7. Jun 26, 2006 at 7:05 PM #27
    PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,058
    Likes Received:
    2,783
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    :umno:
    Michael Bennett does not equal one of the better free agent RB pickups. If he were worth a shit the Vikings wouldn't have gone after Chester Taylor. Bennett is fragile and unreliable
     
  8. Jun 26, 2006 at 8:03 PM #28
    Guest

    Guest Full Access Member

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    10,908
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    not even close. i'm not wasting the time with the research. but weinke definatly doesn't help the rating. so if delhomme is one of the top 8 QBs which I think he is, then adding Weinke drops the team to around 12th in the league. Hell we don't have the best in the NFC South. Atlanta has us beat.
     
  9. Jun 26, 2006 at 8:32 PM #29
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    I don't agree about Atlanta. Schaub may be good but there's no continuity if he has to play. The offense is designed around a left-handed QB, everything changes too much with a right-handed guy. They should get themselves another lefty (or maybe righty).

    But whatever, it's just opinion/speculation brought about because everything else has been beat to death.
     
  10. Jun 26, 2006 at 8:40 PM #30
    chipshot

    chipshot Full Access Member

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Boise
    Pittsburgh
    New England
    Baltimore
    Miami
    Philly

    You have to count Harrington in Miami. He has a hell of alot more experience than Weinke.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2006
Page 3 of 6

Share This Page