spoiled fucking babies

dig even deeper...

12 carries...5 of which came in the first two drives of the game. That's seven carries in the last 51 minutes of the game.

go deeper...

Of those seven carries, 3 of them came after we were down 30-7.

So, from the time the Cardinals took the lead until the Panthers were down 30-7, our best runner...a 1500 yard 20 touchdown back...ran the ball a total of four times.

 

those two runs do count. Of course they do.

But, it's also clear that they lacked consistency running, the line wasn't playing as well as normal, and that most of what they tried didn't work regardless of what it was. To have two nice runs is, well, nice, but sure, two runs don't make everything go. There's no doubt that two longer runs and three runs in a row do make it seem like we ran more than we did.

 

I'm not saying they don't count, but I'd much rather have twenty 4 yard runs than one or two big runs and 18 stuffs.

You're exactly right. We lacked consistency.

 

And lacking consistency was my point. From the coaching to the players. DW is better then that. Our O-line is better then that. Shocker, but Delhomme, as sketchy as he is at times, is better then that. We had a little fudge. A big fudge actually. We got stuffed in a 3rd and 3 (I think 3). But we got stuffed none the less, when it was tied, that set the tempo for the rest of the game. That's a different game if we convert that. But none the less, that set the tempo. Like was said before, 'abandoning the run' doesn't mean you aren't running X% enough of the time. It means you got away from what got you here, in the opportunities you could've used it. Alot of pass plays on first down in the 2nd half. Not panther football. Panther football is CENTERED around running, then play action passing. How do you play action pass when your averaging 1.7 ypc without the 2 big runs? My point exactly. Jake blew up, but it wasn't all him. The O-line should've stepped up, the defense should of stepped up, and the coaches should've stepped up. Because if you've ever played on a team, you would know, that's what a team is, you rally around each other when someone is not performing, or is down. None of that happened. Still doesn't change that Delhomme blew up. Just saying for what it's worth.

 

It's amusing that you would talk about "most people." No one gives a shit what you think, correct? Has anyone on this board ever asked your opinion about anything? If it has ever happened, it certainly doesn't happen often. Meanwhile, even though you claim that "most people are tired of (my) act," I would imagine that I would get asked my opinion more than anyone else on this board with the possible exception of magnus.

I am certainly not unused to being disagreed with. It happens. If everyone else was as smart as I am or saw things as clearly as quickly as I do, then my life would be a lot happier. But those people respect my opinion and at some point they usually realize that I was correct all along.

You're a lying piece of shit. The game was not decided at halftime. The score then was the same as the score at the end of our second possession of the second half, but because you're a dishonest bitch, you want to exclude those two drives because we continued to run the ball.

Make your lies more believable. It was 27-7 with 3:32 left in the first half, but you wanted to include the next drive because that was the one with no runs. It was STILL 27-7 after our first two drives of the second half, but you want to exclude those because we attempted runs during them. You're a dishonest, useless troll.

Yes, that's exactly what it means you fucking moron. It means not running the ball at all except perhaps in goalline and other obvious running situations. Buy a fucking dictionary and look up the word "abandon." "Abandoning the run" is not remotely the same as "running the ball less."

If every waste of oxygen beat me in an argument as often as they claim to, people wouldn't give a shit what I say, and those bitter losers wouldn't follow me around from thread to thread. No one cares what you think because no one believes that you have any knowledge. This thread only adds fuel to that fire.

 

If your team is a 60/40 run/pass game, and shifts to 30/70 one game, it is fair to say they abandoned the run. I wouldn't say they fully abandoned the run, simply because of the positions they were put in by the cajun, but they certainly didn't use the run NEARLY enough in their playcalling. I would fall in between you two, but I would say BUCKO has made the better point.


An unrelated point. When twinkie boy COLON goes on his rants about how he's so smart, and is the ruler of all that is football knowledge and how he writes for "a national published fantasy football magazine" I always immediately think of the Will Ferrell skit..." I am a division manager in charge of 29 people, I drive a dodge Stratus!"

http://www.hulu.com/watch/3526/saturday-night-live-family-dinner

 

No, it isn't. "Abandoning the run game" is not remotely the same thing as "running the ball less." Situations dictate rushing frequency, and moreover, it's hilariously hypocritical for some of the same people to be bashing Trgovac for not deviating from his gameplan while simultaneously bashing Davidson for daring to throw the ball more often given how the game unfolded.

We almost always ran the ball on either first or second down, and there was only one drive where we didn't run at all before Arizona made it 30-7. Davidson ran far more than most OCs would have in that situation. Moreover, would one of you fucking morons acknowledge that Arizona was putting eight defenders in the box? In those situations you are supposed to pass more frequently rather than just being stubborn and running straight ahead. If we didn't have a retarded quarterback who felt like throwing it to the other team, that would have been the smart thing to do.

Given that you're one of the many bitter assholes who follows me around the board just to take shots because you hold a grudge over me making you look like a moron, I'm sure your endorsement carries a lot of weight. It's about as compelling as Hamas endorsing Obama. Post something intelligent once in a while and maybe people will start to care what you think.

 

You're the biggest douche/toolbag on the forum, maybe in the Carolinas, so your posts compel me to reply. Sue me. You're so smart you must be a lawyer too along with being A FANTASY FOOTBALL WRITER IN A NATIONALLY PUBLISHED MAGAZINE.

And I think we've been over this before COLON, but just because you declare you've made me look like a moron or one of your other multiple absurd claims, doesn't mean its true. Watch...

Colon is not a twinkie eating arrogant fat slob who got beat up over an internet message board fight who can't admit a difference in opinion or semantics can be valid.

See...you are still all of the above. Now go get your shinebox.

 

I never said I don't understand why you're bitter or even that you shouldn't be. I'm just saying that you're not doing yourself any favors by letting it lead you to make stupid comments just because you wish I was wrong. If you hate my attitude, tough. I am what I am, and most people are willing to put up with the bad (even if they wish they didn't have to) to get the good.

 

They probably do. Then gouge their own eyes out when they realize the good is yet to be seen. Like I've said many times before, your knowledge (if that's what they call it these days for people like you) could be helpful to this board. But you put yourself above everyone else. To be honest I don't give a rat what you do for a living. It doesn't make you any better then anyone man on this board. Stop being a more-less 'cyber bully' and trying to intimidate and swear at people and grow up. Jesus, I've seen more mature kids in my neighbors daycare.