1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Sosa caught with cork in his bat

Discussion in 'MLB - Baseball Forum' started by K-Town-Yankee, Jun 3, 2003.

  1. kshead

    kshead What's the spread?

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    22,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Maryland
    Fuck Physics. Hated it except for those problems that involved a guy jumping off a cliff or being shot out of a cannon. Took it with a bunch of stinkin EE's too - who already knew electricity - but we skipped the parts that involved PChem and ideal gases. All I know now is that when I flip the switch, the light comes on. Most of the time anyway.

    Ok. Whine over. Carry on.
     
  2. Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Well, the primary force that propels balls comes from the strength of the batter, he's adding his own force to the potential energy of the bat, turning it into kinetic energy, but his own energy is much greater.

    For example. You can probably swing a wiffle bat faster than a wooden bat. But if you are going to hit me with one, make it the wiffle.
     
  3. Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Who was their source. This was a myth that was generally accepted as true in baseball until someone actually looked into it.

    And it does increase velocity. Of the bat.
     
  4. kshead

    kshead What's the spread?

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    22,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Maryland
    You volunteerin' for some class experiments? :D
     
  5. Patti

    Patti ~

    Posts:
    16,755
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    They had a clip of some guy showing you how to cork a bat. I didn't catch his name. But they have shown it more than once so I'll try to pay more attention next time.

    They basically are saying it would increase distance about 1%. Making a 400 foot hit a 404.
     
  6. Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003

    Well, that's at odds with the laws of physics, then. I always knew that Newton was full of shit.
     
  7. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003

    Bobby Valentine on Baseball Tonight said pretty much the same thing. He is the voice of experience, I guess.

    Barry Bonds has his bats made out of maple, too.
     
  8. slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    Could the compression of the bat allow the ball to stay in contact longer thus transfering more kinetic energy :thinking:
     
  9. Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    According to Adair, the exact opposite is true. The cork actually decreases the effeciency of the energy transfer, because it "absorbs" energy from the ball.

    It would be cool if we could disprove his theory. I'm kind of thinking that would have already happened though.

    It does kind of show how an accepted "myth" can be very persuasive in society. Sort of how people thought we got malaria from bad air, for years after scientists knew mosquitoes spread the disease.

    Damn, that was geeky of me.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2003
  10. Big Russ

    Big Russ Full Access Member

    Age:
    41
    Posts:
    256
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Adair was just on ESPN explaining, or trying to explain, his findings. Anyone else catch it? He wasnt all that convincing on the tube.

    He seemed to be claiming that the only reason a corked bat would hit it farther would be the less weight. Drill a hole in it, leave the cork out, and it'll go farther. Why not just order a lighter bat.

    Didnt address the density issue. Did say that the ball isnt on the bat long enough for the cork to affect it. Most of the analysts were were smiling respectfully and nodding. You could tell they werent convinced.

    EDIT: I must not have listened too closely. Bobby V. and Joe Morgan both admit they think it doesnt help.
     
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2003

Share This Page