1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

So....

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by wossa, Oct 8, 2002.

Page 1 of 4
  1. Oct 8, 2002 at 10:04 AM #1
    wossa

    wossa Not a ********* any more

    Age:
    63
    Posts:
    19,308
    Likes Received:
    10
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Jamestown
    are you State fans ready for your annual ass whuppin from the Tar Heels?

    I know the 6-0 Wolfies look like a mis-match for the Heels - but then again they did last year - and some of the other last 8 wins out of 10 for the Heels.

    Durant is playing like the best all around QB in the conference ( yes even better than Rivers ).

    I'm betting on a close high scoring game - Heels by a field goal 41-38. and bye bye BCS dreams for the Wolfies! :D :cool:
     
  2. Oct 8, 2002 at 11:35 AM #2
    chipshot

    chipshot Full Access Member

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Boise
    Rivers
    1481 yds
    13 tds
    5 ints
    177.4 rating
    5 rushing tds
    65% completion

    Durant
    1369 yds
    10 tds
    7 ints
    143.3 rating
    1 rushing td
    59.1% completion

    Please explain how Durant is playing better then Rivers.
     
  3. Oct 8, 2002 at 11:48 AM #3
    BearBryant

    BearBryant Full Access Member

    Posts:
    9,883
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    considerng the competition each has faced, Durant is playing pretty close to Rivers.
     
  4. Oct 8, 2002 at 12:00 PM #4
    BudMan

    BudMan Guest

    Didn't NCSU play CPCC? Oh sorry, I meant UMASS.
     
  5. Oct 8, 2002 at 12:07 PM #5
    mramailman

    mramailman Guest


    Tru dat.

    NC State

    New Mexico 34-14
    East Tenn St 34-0
    Navy 65-19
    Wake Forest 32-13
    Texas Tech 51-48
    Massachusetts 56-24


    UNC

    Miami Ohio L, 27-21

    Syracuse W, 30-22

    Texas L, 52-21

    Georgia Tech L, 21-13

    Arizona St W, 38-35


    I'm sorry but UNC has played better teams so far this year. Not to mention #4 in the country.
     
  6. Oct 8, 2002 at 12:13 PM #6
    BearBryant

    BearBryant Full Access Member

    Posts:
    9,883
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002

    thats what I was saying..Durant would have just as good numbers playing NCSU's pussy ass pathetic joke of a schedule. I wish they would go ahead and get beat so their fans would shut the fuck up. They actually think they have done something. There is 40+ teams that would have the same record/stats playing that schedule. They desreve no recognition what so ever except the distinction of playing the the softest schedule among major conferences.
     
  7. Oct 8, 2002 at 12:21 PM #7
    Shocker

    Shocker Guest

    Bottom line? UNC owns NC State and will beat them again this year. The fairy tale is over Cubpack fans, your team ain't all that. Sorry but State is the most overated team in college football. Heels will win by at least 2 touchdowns.
     
  8. Oct 8, 2002 at 12:22 PM #8
    mramailman

    mramailman Guest

    And I was agreeing with you..... hell Baylor could be undeafeted with that cheesy schedule.
     
  9. Oct 8, 2002 at 12:32 PM #9
    BearBryant

    BearBryant Full Access Member

    Posts:
    9,883
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    oh I see what you were saying now! :D ..Dont know about Baylor being undefeated but the would damn sure have a winning record.
     
  10. Oct 8, 2002 at 12:36 PM #10
    mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    It goes in cycles. State won 5 straight when I was there, and then Mack cranked it up and Sheridan left. State wasn't very good under O'Cain.
     
Page 1 of 4

Share This Page