Sly can you verify on your Tivo?

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/special1/article.adp?id=20050316140609990009

 

http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=WSJ%2FMGArticle%2FWSJ_ColumnistArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1031781627333&path=%21sports&s=1037645509200


"Jack said that he probably fouled Redick."

 

"Neither player nor Hewitt addressed the real controversy: Did Rose overlook Redick tugging on Jack's jersey before the official foul?"

 

But slyboy isn't going to look at that on his Tivo, it would show that dook got a huge break at a critical time in the game which he said they never do.

 

GT never scored another bucket.

 

But that foul called first puts GT on the line, makes a difference right?

 

Let me know when the refs start calling jersey tugs on a regular basis. Nevermind, no need, that is that day JJ starts scoring 50 on a regular basis.

 

Called against UNC a few times this year I know for a fact. So is it a call that dook got in their favor or not? That's the main point, since you have said dook doesn't get those types of calls.

 

I did not see the jersey tug nor the foul on JJ. We had the ball inbounded. I wish it would have been a no call.

Jersey tugs are not worthy of an automatic foul call. One must gain an advantage from it. NOt so cut and dry in this case considering it is up in the air whether or not it even happened.

 

Have you reviewed it yourself yet or just stating something from what you remember happening live?

It appears from the article that is what obvious and did have an affect on the player, but I do know that we can't always believe everything we read from the press.

Partly I am just curious if you will ever admit that dook got away with a call at a very important point in the game, let alone at anytime in a game.