Shawn King next year?

Well thanks and a .... no thanks. Yes I like a debate, but no I'm not trolling. Unlike one or two others, I'm not in the debate to put people down or make assumptions on their character. I enjoy thoughts different than mine. Anyone who only likes to hear themselves talk may need to visit the Dr. if you know what I mean. I've always felt you can learn from anyone, even the people you hate. Call me corny...

We did uncover a prime time source had him in the 5th. Like I said, in the end he is where he belongs...

 

Instead of calling you “corny” we might need to call that Doc and set up an appointment for you. Let’s be real Sandy. Judging from your inability to simply let go of something even when proven to be inaccurate, I don’t imagine you are doing a great deal of “learning” here. You do express yourself quite a bit though. It’s no wonder that Mag gets under your skin on such a regular basis . . . he’s the only one here who has posted more than you have. The difference, Magnus provides some fact based info and well researched analysis. You express your feelings and opinions that are predominantly rooted in the emotional, not the factual. I personally don’t see anything wrong with most of your posts other than you seem to expect us to take you more seriously than we are willing to.
Don’t get me wrong, this board wouldn’t be the same without you. Your sense of humor is sometimes amusing and your tenacity is impressive and ALWAYS amusing. You remind me of my bro-in-laws Jack Russell. He’s always underfoot, barking, whining, begging for attention, growling at the wind, but he’s harmless and fun to play with. )

 

I don't know how to explain it to other than this board is an outlet. But if that is your assesment of me, your sadly mistaken and a very poor judge of character. I am none of those things in the real world, which would be off this board. I never whine about things, the glass is always half full, not half empty... I'll send you a PM, so as not to bore the others with stuff that has already been seen.

 

My problem is being able to take someone seriously and then being able to turn it off. I'll give anyone the benefit of the doubt that they're being legit. I guess it's not so much that he's smart or stupid as much as his apparent evaluation of us that we'd believe some of this, that we don't know better.

>>But if that is your assesment of me, (you're) sadly mistaken and a very poor judge of character.

If you show nothing else, you will get nothing else. When you react so critically to what anyone might have to say that more truthful than it is kind, it can easily end in a fight. When you get mad at something or someone, it easily shows and skews what you think is right.

People don't know much about me. So I've started trying to bring a little more of myself and a little more of the reserved nature I usually bring here in relation to myself. I'm not that concerned about my "image" but I do care about how people perceive what I'm saying. If all I do is bitch, that's what I should expect to be perceived as. If I want to be shown as more, I have to be more.

Right now you show yourself as something you disagree with, but you honestly are. If you expect for people to just assume you're a great guy, you'll be assuming wrong. I'm sure you are. But here, you get into a lot of fights, you automatically make things personal when they aren't, and then you start screaming about character like you're not what you represent here. So you either have to figure out whether it's honestly worth it to you to intentionally look to piss people off, something you've admitted to in the past, or whether it's worth it to be able to "escape" and be the Billy Bad Ass you seem to think you're presenting and deal with the criticism that comes with that.

>>We did uncover a prime time source had him in the 5th.

One. Compared to basically the rest, and that didn't support your claim, which has been argued over time even though in its absolute essence it's impossible.