1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Remember Derrick Thomas?

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Boo, Jul 20, 2004.

Page 2 of 3
  1. Jul 20, 2004 at 3:29 PM #11
    buck nasty

    buck nasty Full Access Member

    Posts:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    honestly, if it gets better, safer roofs on cars, great.
     
  2. Jul 20, 2004 at 3:44 PM #12
    meatpile

    meatpile 7-9

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    35,132
    Likes Received:
    138
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    All up in Boo's mama

    Don't be so divisive - stupid people deserve equal judgement.
     
  3. Jul 20, 2004 at 3:58 PM #13
    Reznor

    Reznor Sunspots

    Posts:
    7,585
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Hickory
    actually, they'll have to cut back on roofs to afford insurance now, so it doesn't quite work the way you're thinking. This is ridiculous, I liked Thomas as a player back when I was a Chiefs fan, but anyone who is speeding and not wearing a seatbelt is responsible for his/her own injuries, imo.
     
  4. Jul 20, 2004 at 4:21 PM #14
    Boo

    Boo Cornholio

    Posts:
    9,765
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte

    that or they'll have to jack up the price by 15K so they can afford the liability insurance...just like what has happened in the medical field.
     
  5. Jul 20, 2004 at 8:35 PM #15
    Malapoo

    Malapoo Full Access Member

    Posts:
    6,147
    Likes Received:
    349
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    NC
    I'm surprised they don't sue the hospital as well because technically he didn't die from the wreck, but from a blood clot that formed and broke loose later on. I'm sure they can blame the hospital for that even though it is a high risk with long term immobility.

    The trouble is the legal system that allows people to win such suits as I'm sure his family will this one. It sets a precedent and there are far too many folks out there looking for a free ride so they don't have to get out and actually [GASP] work! Speeding on ice and no seatbelt - it's called suicide. Sorry, don't mean to disrespect Thomas, but people should use some common sense.
     
  6. Jul 20, 2004 at 8:49 PM #16
    The Sheriff

    The Sheriff Willing to lend a hand

    Posts:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Virginia Beach...that's in Virginia Dumbass
    re

    What's sad is not the fact that cases like these make it to court...it's that attorneys convince twelve dumbasses to agree with them.
     
  7. Jul 20, 2004 at 9:02 PM #17
    PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,059
    Likes Received:
    2,783
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    What the fuck is up with that. Brother don't believe in birth control?
     
  8. Jul 21, 2004 at 11:55 AM #18
    hasbeen99

    hasbeen99 Fighting the stereotype

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Clovis, CA
    Yep, that would be the silver lining. Hope it happens.
     
  9. Jul 21, 2004 at 5:24 PM #19
    Foxman

    Foxman Don't read th

    Posts:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Oz

    The survivors are/were broke. Debt was high cash was low. A tragedy all the way around.
     
  10. Jul 21, 2004 at 5:40 PM #20
    Superfluous_Nut

    Superfluous_Nut pastor of muppets

    Posts:
    33,942
    Likes Received:
    561
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    los angeles
    i can't see GM being held responsible unless they did something overtly unsafe -- like a memo says "we should spend $.75 extra per car for this special thingy that keeps roofs from killing people" and then another memo says "nah, fuck that shit. let them die."

    i don't like people/companies being held responsible for things that aren't illegal/against code/etc. it's not like the auto industry is unregulated or anything. there are so many codes they need to follow that anything they do must have an implicit (if not explicit) seal of approval from the gov't. if the gov't failed to account for roofs, then oh well, lesson learned. maybe this suit will lead to a good standard for roofs. but it shouldn't lead to a dozen new millionaires.
     
Page 2 of 3

Share This Page