1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Nick Goings

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by QC REPRESENT, Jan 15, 2006.

Page 1 of 7
  1. Jan 15, 2006 at 9:57 PM #1
    QC REPRESENT

    QC REPRESENT Full Access Member

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    5,030
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    so he is going to be the man. him and Robertson. we know what he did last year. had some good runs in the Dallas game, and today.

    Superbowl MVP? that would be the ultimate Rudy story
     
  2. Jan 15, 2006 at 10:01 PM #2
    Cattrax

    Cattrax Senior Member

    Posts:
    1,455
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    North Myrtle Beach
    I think there is very little drop off from Foster to Goings. I expect with teams concentrating on Steve Smith, Nick should have a good game.
     
  3. Jan 15, 2006 at 10:11 PM #3
    VA49er

    VA49er Full Access Member

    Posts:
    22,561
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    I tend to agree. Was impressed with Goings last week and today. Seems to be faster but not as much as a "bruiser". It's his time to shine. Hopefully he'll make the most of it, like Foster did last year in Philly.
     
  4. Jan 15, 2006 at 10:17 PM #4
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    my worry is depth
     
  5. Jan 15, 2006 at 10:19 PM #5
    Wp28

    Wp28 I had that dream again...

    Age:
    60
    Posts:
    12,596
    Likes Received:
    60
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Calypso, NC
    I'd assume well put Foster on IR and activatre Alex Haynes. can we go against the Seahawks with 2 TE's and keep Cramer and Haynes active?

    I know Haynes probably ain't great, but he's a body who knows the system.
     
  6. Jan 15, 2006 at 10:19 PM #6
    mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Smith to RB and Peppers to WR?
     
  7. Jan 15, 2006 at 10:35 PM #7
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    we can probably come up with another place to skimp, but sure, I'd rather have healthy backs.

    Haynes has good size, I like that. Hoover should be enough as a backup RB, short term.

    This offense eats up backs.
     
  8. Jan 15, 2006 at 10:36 PM #8
    mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Except for Nick.
     
  9. Jan 15, 2006 at 10:39 PM #9
    Mr. Scot

    Mr. Scot The Voice of Reason

    Age:
    57
    Posts:
    1,360
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2003
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Goings, Robertson and Smart man the RB spot next week.

    More carries and or passes to Hoover probably, and likely some game action for Casey Cramer. Wouldn't mind seeing Hoover run behind Cramer in a "heavy" package.

    Goings may not be as talented as Foster, but he is arguably better suited to the kind of running plays that Henning likes best.

    Next week will definitely be interesting.
     
  10. Jan 15, 2006 at 10:45 PM #10
    Fan. Attic

    Fan. Attic Upstairs Lurker

    Posts:
    769
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Isn't Smart on IR?
     
Page 1 of 7

Share This Page