1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

New NCAA Div I Nomenclature

Discussion in 'College Football Forum' started by AppState, Aug 3, 2006.

  1. AppState

    AppState Mountaineers

    Posts:
    414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    NCAA Approves New Labels for Division I Football
    by NCAA News

    INDIANAPOLIS -- During its summer meetings on Thursday, the NCAA Division I of Directors approved new labels for Division I football. The presidents approved a change in terminology to "Football Bowl Subdivision" for the former I-A classification and "NCAA Football Championship Subdivision" for the former I-AA group. The Collegiate Commissioners Association helped develop the new labels.

    The presidents believe the new nomenclature, which becomes effective in December, more accurately distinguishes Division I institutions for purposes of governing football, the only sport for which such a distinction is necessary. Members felt the old nomenclature inaccurately tiered Division I institutions in all sports, not just football, and produced instances in which media outlets and other entities incorrectly cited institutions as being Division I-AA in basketball or baseball, for example.

    "All Division I institutions, regardless of whether they sponsor football, are in fact and should be referred to as Division I members," said Board Chair and University of Connecticut President Philip Austin. "The only reasons for labeling are the need to distinguish the two football subdivisions for the purpose of governing the sport and to maintain separate statistics. The Board is stressing that the nomenclature reflect the totality of the Division I membership whenever possible and that the subdivision labels be used sparingly. Still, there are instances in which we need to use them, and we feel the new labels are more accurate."

    The new nomenclature does not effect the voting structure used in Division I governance matters.
     
  2. AppState

    AppState Mountaineers

    Posts:
    414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    NCAA to rename college football subdivisions

    By Steve Wieberg, USA TODAY
    The NCAA is doing a little re-labeling, eliminating the Division I-A and I-AA tags that officially separate college football's major and more modest programs.

    Acknowledging frustration that the classification often brands an entire university as big-time or non-big-time, the association's Division I Board of Directors moved Thursday to rename the subdivisions. Beginning in December, they'll be known by their respective postseason formats.

    What now are I-A programs — the Texases, Notre Dames and others vying for bowls — will play in the Football Bowl Subdivision. The Georgia Southerns, Montanas and others now known as I-AA will play in the NCAA Football Championship Subdivision, alluding to the 16-team playoff that settles its national title.

    Only the names will change. Individual school affiliations, postseason formats, scholarship guidelines and other divisional specifics will remain the same.

    Conference commissioners and other officials who came up with the new monikers sought the action "to move away from using those terms (I-A and I-AA) more broadly than what they were intended for," said David Berst, the NCAA's vice president for Division I.

    "We'll attempt" to drop them, Berst said, in conjunction with the Dec. 22 I-AA championship, which will become the "Division I football championship."
     
  3. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Let's have another big argument over all this. That was fun.
     
  4. AppState

    AppState Mountaineers

    Posts:
    414
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    I'm in.
     
  5. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Yeah, well you and I would agree. I'm waiting for Mags to come in with his Divsion II shit. :blah:
     
  6. 40Whiners

    40Whiners Full Access Member

    Posts:
    405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    if App beats State in September...then we can argue.
     
  7. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    What if Furman beats the Holes?
     
  8. chipshot

    chipshot Full Access Member

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Boise
    wow, that's dumb considering most people favor championships over bowls
     
  9. 40Whiners

    40Whiners Full Access Member

    Posts:
    405
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2005
    could happen, but not likely...just as ASU beating State isn't likely. Furman and App are great AA programs, but not on par with ACC schools (except Wake)
     
  10. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Not put words in your mouth, but didn't you mean to say 'Duke'?
     

Share This Page