1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Jurevicius agrees to contract with Buccaneers

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by LarryD, Apr 9, 2002.

  1. boo-urns

    boo-urns Guest

    they may be tall..but they are not fast. tampa's offense in general lacks speed...more than ever now that dunn is gone.
     
  2. Y2Buddy

    Y2Buddy Guest

    Jerry Rice and Tim Brown are not exactly speedsters.
     
  3. meatpile

    meatpile 7-9

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    35,132
    Likes Received:
    138
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    All up in Boo's mama
    Well, If you figure, without Anderson, we can luck up and get one high quality starter out of the other 6 - maybe Cousins or Vinson - then we're in the same boat now as we were last year with Evans.

    I don't see Hitchcock getting any Free Agent action.

    I don't *necessarily* see our CB situation as worse than last year, particularly when you've got:

    Fields-Morgan-Navies
    Rucker-Giblet-Jenkins-Peppers

    That kinda shit, and an aggreesive scheme, can make a corner look real good. Or maybe real bad.
     
  4. boo-urns

    boo-urns Guest

    yeah...but they are future hall of famers...the buc's receivers can't carry those two's jock straps combined.
     
  5. Y2Buddy

    Y2Buddy Guest

    They are HOF's for their careers, not last season.
     
  6. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    True. Especially if we keep Rucker on and Navies or someone else can fill the strongside role, especially someone with good size since Morgan's our only tallish LB.
    That'll get us better against the run and to a point against the pass. But we can't do both, get two starting corners and get more rush. The proper way is Peppers and then a corner, yes, but if we got two corners this year followed by a decent swing end, and then got a more solid LDE with similar rush potential like mentioned above then we'd be doing about the same...pushing one need back. It's not really the way I'd go at it conventionally and it'd piss some people off good and hard but if we did it I'd be just as happy as with the more conventional way.
     
  7. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    And they play for Oakland, too.
     
  8. LarryD

    LarryD autodidact polymath

    Posts:
    29,846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Location:
    living the dream
    well, it fits in with my three-year plan for acquiring talent to make a run at the super bowl. it started with last year's draft and o-line fixings. this one is phase two. next year will be phase three.

    you have to look at it as one big roster/depth chart fix -- not three separate seasons. that way, you can take the longview and not feel pressured into taking the end when you can get a stud corner that you feel safer with. now isn't the time to gamble, in my opinion. they've done that far too many times.
     

Share This Page