Jameson Curry

Nice hop into another argument by the way. If you can't win one battle, by all means find another. OF course, you lose the war, but that hasn't stopped you so far either.

None of us are happy with the egg our team laid in the NCAA or CUSA tournaments. We were one of the better teams and had a great shot at making a run, but our guys laid down and didn't try. 49er fans have already been down the road of ripping them for it. That has nothing to do with the regular season they had and your fucking retarded argument that we got the seeding we deserved, and that MSU deserved better.

Your arguments are always so self serving. I'd love to get you in a courtroom and have the judge rip you to pieces for me (I wouldn't even get the chance, he/she would jump all over you). You wouldn't last 10 seconds with the circular and evasive reasoning you try to pull.

 

So you’re trying to tell me that the Big 10 was stronger than CUSA this year? Please. CUSA had a better overall conference RPI, and we had six tournament participants to their three. But if you ignore those facts, sure, the Big 10 was better and I’m sure lil ole UNCC would have floundered in it.

You forgot the part about them losing to two 100+ teams, and four of our top 50 wins were on the road. You should also add that we won 11 road/neutral games to their six.

Not a whole lot of difference there. They could have played the #1 schedule in country, but if they didn't beat anyone, who cares.

 

You are the one who brought up Michigan State. I said that if anyone from CUSA deserved to be bitching about their seed it would be UAB. Of course, they didn;t need to bitch cause they went out and won.

My arguements are self serving? What exactly is it that I am trying to serve? I see something and I give my opinion on it - supported by facts. You see something and complain how UNCC wasn't given a fair shot because someone else got a break too.

I would do just fine in a court room, but if your performance on this board is any indication, I am sure that you have plenty of experience in getting your shit handed back to you by both judges and opposing counsel.

 

I feel that I need to add:

Let's break down exactly what the committee looks at.

Criteria - Advantage

RPI - Charlotte
Road Wins - Charlotte
Top 50 wins - Charlotte
Quality road wins - Charlotte
RPI 100+ losses - Charlotte
Non-conference record - Charlotte
Last 10 - Even
SOS - Michigan St

 

Beautiful. Concise and unassailable. No circular reasoning like vp employs. Verdict for Nova.

 

I am not saying that the Big 10 was a better conference or that they sent more teams to the tourney. I am saying that if you replaced the awful teams that y'all used to get to 12 conference win with some Michigans, Purdues, Iowas, etc. then you would not have won 12 games. In fact you probably would have been right around .500, which, coupled with a losing record in your OOC games would have left you right around .500 or with a losing record. Hence the not making the NIT comment.

The selection committee always makes some strange moves, I guess they thought that MSU deserved it. None of that has anything to do with the fact that if a team from CUSA deserves to be complaing about their 9 seed, it is UAB and not y'all. That was my point.

I think that there is quite a bit of difference between the number 18 and 25 teams. And you are right - UNC went 8-20 with the toughest schedule. Didn't mean jack shit.

 

That is just about funny as shit. You can't even understand what I am arguing and yet you keep trying to say that I lose. Here is a hint.

The first 2 lines are particularly important. You are the one who keeps bringin up MSU, not me.

Where did you get your law degree? St. Coppias of Illinois?

 

That's it, you aren't retarded, you're brain damaged. Awful teams that we beat like Louisville and Cincinnati from a conference thats ent more teams to the NCAAs because it was better. You're fucking just arguing to get the last word in now. You left reason behind long ago.

And it's a bullshit point. You say we didn't deserve our seeding because of our regular season, but it was better than UABs. Whenever necessary, you switch your basis for arguments which is a common fallacy among uneducated minds like yours. I'm happy that UAB won their first round game and then beat a highly overrated UK team. (an under .500 FAMU team ran with them, after all). In fact, I was rooting for the Blazers like crazy, but it does not prove who deserved what seed. It just proved that their guys came to play in March and ours laid down. A point we stipulated long ago but you keep bringing up like it has any bearing on your ridiculous assertions about seeding.

 

VPkozel, plain and simple

You'll be posting here at midnight tonight if anyone dares argue with your retarded inconsistent theories. The fact that you have nothing better to do does not make you right.

 

You left out the Tulanes, ECUs, Houstons and South Floridas. Just curiously, what do you think your record would have been playing MSU's schedule?

Where did I say that. That would be 2 quotes you need to be looking for now. What I said was that if ANY team had a gripe it would have been UAB, who had a comparable record to you and MORE IMPORTANTLY had just bounced your ass out of the CUSA tourney.