1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Inactives

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Wp28, Nov 20, 2005.

Page 3 of 3
  1. Nov 20, 2005 at 5:09 PM #21
    y2b

    y2b King of QC

    Posts:
    18,518
    Likes Received:
    196
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    they held the Bears to 13 points after the offense gave away 10 and could keep the ball for hardly anytime at all

    they didn't dominate like they did the Jets, but they we're playing from behind, the bears played with a lead all day...I really shouldn't have to explain that
     
  2. Nov 20, 2005 at 5:13 PM #22
    ss54

    ss54 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    The main problem with the D is when we had them backed up where we could get good field position if we stopped them, the Defense let them have 30-40 yards before forcing them to punt.
     
  3. Nov 20, 2005 at 5:14 PM #23
    Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    See the worn down statement.
     
  4. Nov 20, 2005 at 5:17 PM #24
    y2b

    y2b King of QC

    Posts:
    18,518
    Likes Received:
    196
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003

    werd
     
  5. Nov 20, 2005 at 5:19 PM #25
    ss54

    ss54 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    715
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Fair enough, although dropped passes saved the defense in the beginning before they were "worn down."
     
  6. Nov 20, 2005 at 5:47 PM #26
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    That's all the Bears usually score anyway. The problem is that we gave up far too many yards to Chicago and couldn't get the ball back for the offense. If you want to say the defense was better than the offense, I have no problem with that, but there's no question that the defense played poorly today too. We couldn't stop the run, and we made a terrible rookie quarterback look good. If not for some drops by Muhammad and Clark, they would have scored more than just 13.
     
  7. Nov 20, 2005 at 9:23 PM #27
    chipshot

    chipshot Full Access Member

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Boise
    It's less than they average.
     
  8. Nov 20, 2005 at 10:18 PM #28
    HeadCase

    HeadCase dazed and confused

    Posts:
    3,106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    for the most part i gotta agree. smitty played pretty well. fox looked good on the sideline. probably some, but i can't think of any other positives.
     
  9. Nov 20, 2005 at 10:19 PM #29
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Good point about Smith. I shouldn't have said everyone.
     
Page 3 of 3

Share This Page