Hey Piper

what do I need to prove? you're the one crying about how overrated the SEC is and every sportswriter agrees with you. find something that says the SEC is overrated.

 

Dumbass, I already did. Remember this link: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/writers/stewart_mandel/10/09/weekend.rewind/index.html ? But since you complained about it being three weeks old (as if that makes you any less wrong), I posted the new one from yesterday. While it does not include the word "overrated," the quoted portions very strongly indicate as much. But in addition to being someone who does nothing but bitch on this board (you must be a real treat at parties), you will steadfastly deny anything that proves you wrong. Good luck with that.

 

I'll go ahead and lock this so it will go away, collin. your ego has been damaged way too much for one thread.

 

*rofl* Trying to hide your embarrassment?

 

now why would i be embarrased? I'm not the one that said

[/B]Also note that this is not just my opinion. It seems as if all the analysts, both online at ESPN and SI, and those covering the weekend games, all agree about the SEC being overrated.


but cant come with anything but a 3 week old article and another that doesnt even mention the word overrated. Where are all the other espn and si analysts articles? It's ok to have an opinion, collin. Just dont try to push it on other people and make up lies to make yourself sound like you know what you are talking about.

 

I'm pretty sure that Mandel calling the SEC "weak" and saying "the league that merited four preseason top-10 teams isn't what it was cracked up to be this year" means that he thinks they're overrated. You pretending otherwise shows just how desperate and pathetic you actually are.

It's ok, DaveW. You can admit that you're a know-nothing dick who has absolutely nothing better to do with his life than randomly bitch at people, or that you're completely incapable of ever actually posting something productive. Bitches have a use in life too, I suppose.

On second thought, how can someone accumulate over 18,000 posts without ever demonstrating anything resembling knowledge? 18,000 posts worth of bitching and spam is quite a prolific output. Sadly, I'd bet that would rank as one of your top achievements on a resumé.

 

my bad..i didnt realize there was only ONE guy that was an analyst for all of espn and si online. my fault. ok..come back with some name calling, the first sign that someone has been owned and really has nothing left.

 

Should a person who does absolutely nothing but name calling really be making this statement?

 

still nothing?

 

It's almost like this article was written expressly for DaveW: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/writers/stewart_mandel/10/26/mailbag/index.html