1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Good game Kansas

Discussion in 'Charlotte Hornets' started by slydevl, Mar 27, 2003.

Page 1 of 2
  1. Mar 27, 2003 at 11:50 PM #1
    slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    Several bad plays by Sanders down the stretch and career game by Collison. Tough to match a game like he had. And where the fuck was Reddick?
     
  2. Mar 27, 2003 at 11:56 PM #2
    DaveW

    DaveW Super Moderator

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    25,782
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    shooters have off nights. Reddick's came at a bad time. Sanders lost that game. I've never said about an individual. How many passes can one guy miss? Sanders lost that game.
     
  3. Mar 27, 2003 at 11:58 PM #3
    Bunky

    Bunky .

    Age:
    56
    Posts:
    7,784
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    reddick's shot was soooo flat. i haven't heard bigger clanks off the rim since maktar played.
     
  4. Mar 27, 2003 at 11:58 PM #4
    WYDD

    WYDD Everybody dance now.

    Age:
    45
    Posts:
    4,147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Tegucigalpa
    well, not hitting a shot for like 10 minutes hurts. Mostly good d by kansas although reddick had plenty of open looks. Damn, i wish duke had a big man with foot work like collison.
     
  5. Mar 28, 2003 at 12:02 AM #5
    slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    Randolph may get there. Took Collison a while too. Yeah that 6 minute dry spell killed us. Thought Jones made a few bad decisions making that same move over and over only to be rejected each time.
     
  6. Mar 28, 2003 at 12:06 AM #6
    DaveW

    DaveW Super Moderator

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    25,782
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    good season by Duke anyway. Everyone talks about how young UNC is but Duke is pretty young also. Hell everyone is young these days.
     
  7. Mar 28, 2003 at 6:52 AM #7
    UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Sanders sucked on offense, but he was great on D. If he didn't play this game, dook would have been blown out by a 50 pt, 25 rb effort by Collison.

    Good run for dook, they definitely overachieved for such a young team.
     
  8. Mar 28, 2003 at 6:59 AM #8
    UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    dook may be younger than normal, but they aren't close to UNC.

    If you assign a point for each year a player has been there from the main players that play any minutes to speak of for each team then dook would have a 2.22 average, while UNC would have a 1.25, so that is almost a full year more experience.
     
  9. Mar 28, 2003 at 7:03 AM #9
    PanthersReturn

    PanthersReturn Serial killer of threads

    Age:
    63
    Posts:
    1,091
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Southeast Charlotte
    C'mon Fever, that's due to Buckner, Horvath & Sanders all getting partial credit. You know they aren't worthy.

    Plus, you had three superstars transfer out last year...

    Fingleton...Daniel Boone...and Morrison, the squirrel on amphetamines...:p
     
  10. Mar 28, 2003 at 7:05 AM #10
    UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    I didn't include any player's that didn't play major minutes for each team, So I didn't use Buckner at all in that.
     
Page 1 of 2

Share This Page