For those doubting Bunting...

I'm thinking Washington State.

2003 (Will not play California) August 30 Idaho at Pullman
September 6 Notre Dame at South Bend
September 13 Colorado at Boulder
September 20 NEW MEXICO AT PULLMAN (FCD/BD)
September 27 Oregon at Eugene
October 4 ARIZONA AT PULLMAN (HC)
October 11 Open
October 18 Stanford at Stanford
October 25 OREGON STATE AT PULLMAN (DD)
November 1 USC at Los Angeles
November 8 UCLA AT PULLMAN (AFD)
November 15 ARIZONA STATE AT PULLMAN
November 22 Washington at Seattle


2004 (Will not play California) September 4 New Mexico at Albuquerque
September 11 IDAHO AT PULLMAN (AFD)
September 18 Open
September 25 Open
October 2 Arizona at Tucson
October 9 OREGON AT PULLMAN (HC)
October 16 STANFORD AT PULLMAN
October 23 Oregon State at Corvallis
October 30 USC AT PULLMAN (DD)
November 6 UCLA at Los Angeles
November 13 Arizona State at Tempe
November 20 WASHINGTON AT PULLMAN


2005 (Will not play Arizona) September 3 Idaho at Pullman
September 10 Nevada at Reno
September 17 Open
September 24 Open
October 1 Oregon State at Corvallis
October 8 Stanford at Pullman (HC)
October 15 UCLA at Pullman
October 22 California at Berkeley
October 29 USC at Los Angeles
November 5 Arizona State at Pullman (DD)
November 12 Oregon at Pullman (AFD)
November 19 Washington at Seattle


2006 (Will not play Arizona) September 2 San Diego State at San Diego
September 9 IDAHO AT PULLMAN
September 16 BAYLOR AT PULLMAN
September 23 Stanford at Stanford
September 30 OREGON STATE AT PULLMAN
October 7 Open
October 14 UCLA at Pasadena
October 21 CALIFORNIA AT PULLMAN
October 28 USC AT PULLMAN
November 4 Arizona State at Tempe
November 11 Oregon at Eugene
November 18 WASHINGTON AT PULLMAN

 

Yes. We are talking regular season. Which is why I say it can't be done. No bowl freebies.

I think you are barking up the right tree by looking in the PAC-10 though. I started to go with UCLA instead of Oregon. Have to see how their new hire does. Maybe Washington? - depending upon who they hire after this year. Both of those teams have the resources. I just went with "the PAC-10 beats each other up" theory and left it at that.

For the most part I'm just tired of Larry jerking me around over ONE example. It's the exception, not the rule.

Edit: I'm calling the AD at Wash State and talking to them about that Idaho contract.

 

Well, therein lies the problem VP. Even if you FIND the needle in the haystack someone is going to come along and take him. I've been sweating bullets over Beamer leaving every offseason from 97-01. I think he's there for good now. But every time a team like Bama came sniffing around? I got real nervous. I wouldn't have blamed him for taking a job like that. No one would. And that is why teams inside of the top dozen or so will always piss on the lesser guys. I don't even think K ST or us belong in that list I gave. I just know that those two teams will always schedule UMass and JMU.

Of course, the fact that the big lift from the small is why I will ALWAYS root for the lesser guys too.

 

Washington was the first that came to mind, but they have some tougher non-conference games.

I dunno if UCLA can turn it around quickly enough with Carroll punking them.

c'mon. Gimmme the bowl games.

 

I'm not sure I understand who is trying to prove what

 

Just take Louisville tonight and don't worry about it.

 

Past that. Now I'm just trying to figure out a way to seperate kshead from his money.

 

Alabama

1989- 10-2
1990- 7-5
1991- 11-1
1992- 13-0
1993- 9-3-1
1994- 12-1
1995- 8-3
1996- 10-3
1997- 4-7
1998- 7-5
1999- 10-3
2000- 3-8
2001- 7-5
2002- 10-3

 

You misunderestimate me. I ain't making a bet I can't dictate the terms on unless you are a book.

Are you one? Huh? Are you? If so, I'm ready to bet. I can control myself. Really. I can.

 

no..he is a pussy who just picks the winner straight up