1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Fat Back

Discussion in 'Food & Drink Forum' started by Plate Dad, Apr 9, 2009.

  1. wordsworth

    wordsworth Full Access Member

    Posts:
    13,726
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    WNC
    :stuart:I giggled a little.
     
  2. Fro

    Fro FFFFFFFFFffffffffffffffff

    Posts:
    15,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    duh

    that shit was good
     
  3. wordsworth

    wordsworth Full Access Member

    Posts:
    13,726
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    WNC
    Bless your heart- really.
     
  4. jazzbluescat

    jazzbluescat superstar...yo.

    Posts:
    22,696
    Likes Received:
    81
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Spring Lake, NC
    That's why I take an aspirin every day, so's I can have my fatback. That's a fact...
     
  5. Plate Dad

    Plate Dad It is what it is!!!!

    Posts:
    6,039
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Location:
    Southern W-S
    Green Beans & Pintos. Outstanding. Not sure about the collards. Use ham hock for that. Loved the fry out the rinds crunch. Fatback does not kill you it is stress.
     
  6. fastlane22

    fastlane22 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    494
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2007
    Try Jomars in Lancaster, SC. They have the world famous fatback buffet bar. I stopped in to try it. Pintos, Green beans, black eyes peas, fried chicken livers, cornbread and fatback. That was on plate one. Plate two was fried porkchops, fried squash, okra with tomatoes, mashed potatoes with gravy and more fatback. The nanner puddin was excellent as was the peach cobbler. I think its ok to do this one or twice a year, but any more than that and I think your in trouble. They also have a nice picture on the wall with Jomar shaking hands with fridgerator Perry giving his seal of approval.
     
  7. gottalaff

    gottalaff Smartass

    Posts:
    41,027
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Right behind you
    HEEMIE-BAJEEEBIE!!!!
     
  8. tonync55

    tonync55 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    9,854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    Location:
    Western North Carolina
    First study finds MRSA in U.S. pigs and farmers; U.K reports 3 patients sickened with the bacterium from eating pork only.
    An effective way to say there isn't a problem is never to look. That seems to be precisely what most U.S. government food-safety agencies are doing when it comes to determining whether the livestock in our food supply is contaminated with MRSA and if so, whether the often-fatal bacterium is being passed on to consumers who buy and consume that meat.

    We know that some strains of MRSA – methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus – are extremely dangerous. Dr. Monina Klevens, of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, examined the cases of the disease reported in hospitals, schools and prisons in one year and extrapolated that "94,360 invasive MRSA infections occurred in the United States in 2005; these infections were associated with death in 18,650 cases."

    Earlier his year, Dr. Scott Weese, from the Department of Pathobiology at the Ontario Veterinary College told those attending the International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases at the CDC that there was a problem. He and his colleagues had found MRSA in 10 percent of 212 samples of pork chops and ground pork bought in four Canadian provinces.

    "I think it is very likely that the situation is the same in the U.S.," he told me in a phone interview.

    "We've proven MRSA is in pigs and the marketed pork in Canada, and we know that it's also in U.S. pigs. It's inconceivable that it wouldn't also be found in the pork products from those pigs."

    This raised a bunch of obvious questions, such as, who exactly is checking to see if antibiotic-resistant staph bacteria is in the 762 million pounds of Canadian pork that's imported into the U.S. each year?

    The answer appears to be no one.

    It should be the USDA. Dr. David Goldman is in charge of the agency's four laboratories that examine imported food.

    "Any pathogen or hazard that's transmitted through the foods we regulate is a potential issue for us, and so you know, certainly we are aware of the study (Weese) did," Goldman told me during an interview at a recent food-safety meeting in Seattle.

    "There is no indication MRSA has been identified in swine going into the retail market. Not in this country. Not in swine or other livestock being sold for food in this country," the doctor added.

    But, none of the USDA labs that he runs are checking for MRSA in imported meat.

    "We just don't have a test for it," Goldman said.

    So, do we have MRSA in our American grown pigs?

    The Food and Drug Administration says it doesn't know.

    Mike Herndon, an agency spokesman, said FDA scientists have been "following the emergence of MRSA from humans and animals in Central Europe and Canada and are monitoring the situation very closely."

    The FDA is aware of Weese's study, but "we do not yet have similar data with regards to the MRSA situation among food animals and retail meats," Herndon said.

    There is no indication that FDA has tested meat for MRSA.

    But the FDA and USDA eagerly pointed to a group called the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System as the protector of food and humans from foodborne bacteria. The coalition of scientists from several federal agencies primarily target salmonella, campylobacter and E. coli.

    But the group does not currently screen for MRSA.

    The National Pork Producers Council in Washington is sure there's no problem. They told me "there is nothing to worry about; MRSA (in pigs) has not been found this side of the border" and "USDA and CDC has given our pigs a clean bill of health."

    A CDC spokeswoman told me that she could find "no indication we made that statement."

    Interestingly, the pork lobbyists have said their industry would oppose any attempt to test all livestock for MRSA, calling the testing "unnecessary to protect public health."

    Whereas our government apparently doesn't see the need nor have the ability to see if pigs in the U.S. are carrying MRSA, Tara Smith, an assistant professor for the University of Iowa department of epidemiology, and her graduate researchers have done what is apparently is the first testing of swine for MRSA in the U.S.

    They swabbed the noses of 209 pigs from 10 farms in Iowa and Illinois and found MRSA in 70 percent of the porkers. :hilljack::helpsmilie:

    Today, in Boston, at the annual meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Abby Harper, one of Smith's graduate assistants, presented the results of a study that she and Michael Male did on 20 workers at the Iowa swine farms. Harper reported that 45 percent of the workers carried the same MRSA bacterium as the pigs
     
  9. gottalaff

    gottalaff Smartass

    Posts:
    41,027
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Right behind you
    COOK YER MEAT!!!! :FOFastpizza:
     
  10. gridfaniker

    gridfaniker Loathsome

    Age:
    59
    Posts:
    40,503
    Likes Received:
    12
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    blue states
     

Share This Page