1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Draft Countdown new mock

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by CalloftheWild, Mar 27, 2006.

  1. CalloftheWild

    CalloftheWild Full Access Member

    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    1- Lendale White
    2- Dom Byrd (Fasano goes one pick higher to Bears)
    3- Roman Harper S

    Not bad at all but missing Fasano would stink, he seems like our type of te

    However, NO LB!!!
     
  2. CalloftheWild

    CalloftheWild Full Access Member

    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Mario Williams no. 2!?!?

    Would love it for him, but hate to see him an 'Aint
     
  3. stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
  4. Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    That would be a great draft for us IMHO. We have Draft and Seward at linebacker and that does not constitute a big drop off from Short.
     
  5. Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    If it falls that way it would be pretty tempting to move up in the second round to get Jason Allen or even Ko Simpson.
     
  6. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    We have 3 linebacking spots and only one capable back-up (Seward) with one girl who is extremely injury-prone and one who hasn't started at SLB in years (and is 30 years old). Whether you want to go there in the first round or not, LB clearly needs to be addressed more than any other position.
     
  7. Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    We have three decent starters and one decent backup. I agree we have a need there but I do not see it as big as running back. If Foster were durable sure but he is not and we have very little behind him.

    All that being said if Williams and White are off the board in round one then I probably go with a linebacker like Carpenter. I would not draft Maroney or the other second tier guys in the first if a good LB was available.
     
  8. McFly41

    McFly41 Work Hard...PLAY HARDER!

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    11,852
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    IOWA
    Short wasn't great, but I think far too many people under value him. He wasn't flashy, but he was solid. Draft would suffice, but to say Seward would definately be an upgrade is baseless at best.
    OLB is the most glaring need, no doubt, even assuming Davis moves to LB. I'd rather have Draft and Seward as back-ups or at least have to compete for a starting job. Getting the job via attrition is not exactly an upgrade.
     
  9. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Are you too stupid to understand that one tailback plays at a time in the base offense, while three linebackers play at a time in the base defense? So if we have three decent starters at RB and three decent starters at LB, explain to me how RB is more of a need. Please tell me you aren't too stupid to understand that much math. 3 for 1 position vs. 3 for 3 positions.
     
  10. Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    We have three decent starters at runningback?


    :umno:
     

Share This Page