1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Delhomme

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by meatpile, Sep 10, 2003.

  1. Clay

    Clay Full Access Member

    Age:
    44
    Posts:
    5,997
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    and he did not disappoint.
     
  2. rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    oh shit (sigh)



    I'm going to bed early tonight :blurp:
     
  3. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    The first dig was at Henning. I wasn't blaming Weinke for the pass, but it was high.

    And no, I didn't want Weinke to fail. I wanted to win the game, first and foremost. I felt like he just didn't have it. But nice work deciding what I feel and telling me. It's wrong, but I'm sure that won't matter.

    You're really harping over the fact I cheered a completion? Did I blame Weinke? Honestly, I'd call the earliest problems a combo of a bunch of deep passes we didn't need to try, and drops. Luckily, the D dropped some early, too.


    It was the same chuck-it-and-pray shit Delhomme does. Pretending otherwise is just like pretending I really wanted Weinke to fail because I don't believe he's that good. Seeing Weinke out there do pretty much all the same negatives as Delhomme was fairly enlightening. For every "pretty pass", there were some deep floaters, and some passes that made it nowhere close. High throws, too. A lot of the stuff all of us have pinned on Jake.

    And yes, this was worse than anything Jake's ever done. You always complain heavily about the INTs that Jake doesn't get credited against, because people drop them. Weinke could've easily had 6, 7. Jake ever done that? Jake ever throw for this many meaningless yards?


    "Devotion to the truth". Come on. No one believes that. You're out to forward your own opinion and nothing more. Let's stop pretending you have some higher goal, purpose, or anything else in mind.

    Not to mention the undying focus on me first and foremost, as if there's no bias there. And if you think that I"m being hated the way you are, you're basically talking about 9erpi and Golden Hammer, both of which were pissy well before you left anyway.






    I wholeheartedly agree with this, though the "single biggest culprit" only because of his position. Everyone's fallen off the way he has.
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2006
  4. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    You're just digging your own grave, chief. Absolutely everyone saw the play and absolutely no one else saw it the way you're describing it. No one, not meatpile or any other Jake defenders are so casual about lying that they'd actually say it was just chucked up in the air. Everyone but you agrees that it was a beautifully thrown ball because it was. All you're doing by continuing to argue the point is to make yourself look worse, so you really should have used your old trick of pretending you didn't say what you actually did.

    That said, I appreciate the fact that you're not actually going to argue with me about the abject stupidity of you saying that Weinke today was worse than Jake has ever been. That was so mind-bogglingly retarded that you really are better off pretending that someone hijacked your account temporarily.
    Whether or not people believe me is irrelevant. The way you judge the accuracy of that statement is to look at my record, and the fact is that I have admitted that I was wrong about players when I actually have been (Smith, Foster, etc) and that I've criticized players I like very much when they deserved it (Peppers, etc). Me being devoted to the truth doesn't mean that I'm always right, but it does mean that my highest goal is to get things right, while your highest goal is to establish status supremacy all the while disavowing any concern for your place in the hierarchy.
    Of course I'm biased against you. I can't stand you. You make me physically nauseous, and it's because you're not stupid by birth. You're an intelligent guy who possesses the knowledge and skills to actually discern the truth and you waste all that to glorify your own ego. That makes you much, much worse than someone who is just born stupid. But while I'm biased against you, I give you credit when you actually deserve it and in cases like this where I am critical of you, I provide proof to back up what I'm saying.

    You did mock Weinke and pull for him to fail. You did berate people who disagreed with you. You did say that Weinke just "chucked the ball up" on his first long completion to Carter. You did say that Weinke today was worse than Jake has ever been.
     
  5. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    Oh, I'm digging my own grave? You're saying I wanted Weinke to lose with no actual proof, and only "a completion!" to state that I did. So, basically, you'd set your mind on loading up on me before you even read what I said.
    He chucked it up there. Just as Jake does. It's what we do. I saw a lot of things Weinke did, that Jake does on a regular basis. Part of that's coaching.

    go back and look at the edit. Nobody else has argued that, and you haven't actually provided anything behind it. Jake's Philly 04 was pretty fucking awful, and to me, this was worse. This game was better than Randy Fasani starting, and not much more. Unless you love garbage yards in between INTs.
    Oh, certainly, you can always write it off as "well they just don't like me" and pretend it's for that. The end result is that you're forwarding an agenda, which is the same as what this is. It's not about "truth".

    And yet you can pretend that singling me out and being worried about what I'm saying, totally negating the context or statements by anyone else, is rational? Allright. That really holds no water at all.

    Plus, nobody's going to read all the way through you bitching for 10,000 words how you want to take out your anger on me.

    I did mock him. I didn't ever once pull for him to fail, which is why your bias is harmful to you. You've created something that doesn't exist.

    I've mocked tons of players. As have you. I came in wanting a win, wanting Weinke to be his best. He wasn't, whether you think his best is better than Delhomme or not. I didn't, and don't, blame the loss on Weinke. I don't believe he was the worst problem. I believe the same problems exist as existed last week that existed the week before.
     
  6. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    No, I have proof. You mocked him repeatedly and then were so audacious as to pretend that a beautiful pass to Carter was just "chucking it up there." You did want Weinke to fail and everyone can see that, because unlike meatpile and others who just stuck to defending Delhomme, you went out of your way to bash Weinke in an attempt to put down the people who criticized Jake. That's showing how you care more about your status on TBR than you do about the Panthers winning. That's how sick you are.
    Oh good lord. The only thing more embarrassing than your transparent need for supremacy is your intractable stubbornness. Getting you to admit that you were wrong about anything is an exercise in futility. Look, the pass was a beautiful deep ball. Do you even notice that no one at all is supporting your description of that play? Not meatpile, not anyone. No one is standing with you on that because you're so obviously full of shit. Other people at the very same moment were posting about what a great throw it was, because that was the truth.
    Fair enough, I should have realized that you wouldn't have the integrity to back off something even that stupid. Weinke had a mediocre game with some good plays and some spectacularly bad decisions. It was certainly not nearly as bad as some games Jake has had where he had just as many bad decisions and none of the good plays. What you're saying is so stupid that it's still hard to believe that you're saying it.
    My agenda is to get things right. Your agenda is to look "right" and to establish yourself as superior to others while insisting that you don't care about looking superior to others. Because I value truth more than appearances, I can say that I'm an asshole and that I generally don't care about hurting people's feelings and that I'd rather them feel bad but stop saying stupid things than to feel good and say all the idiotic things that come to mind. Because you don't value the truth, you're a dickhead and berate people endlessly but then pretend that you don't act like me at all. You pretend you only did that in the past. Well here's a wakeup call, junior, you did it the entire time I was away.
    Heh, I know you desperately hope they won't because you're scared of them seeing how exposed you are, but trust me, they'll read it for the entertainment value. A lot of people may despise me and my presence, but they also love it when I kick your ass.
     
  7. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    OMG I had a differing opinion from you? I'm audacious.

    I do believe it was chucking it up there. I found it no different than the other deep balls he put up there, except one later floated a lot more. All of them were, at best, just thrown up for grabs. Just like 99% of Jake's. If that's hate, or whatever conspiracy theory crap you can come up with to justify it, then whatever.

    And yet you have no actual proof. If you were being told this, you'd call me a liar. You'd ask for any actual proof that this has happened, and you'd fucking flop around like you couldn't understand how anyone could come to that conclusion. Since I don't expect you have anything concrete, I won't ask for it. I'll take it for what it is - you misconstruing something into something huge that never existed.

    except you have no proof and it's not actually true. Naturally, I'd see someone coming back to attack me as caring more about "status" here than I do.

    And nobody else has mentioned anything at all about me wanting to see Weinke fail. Certainly, no one in chat would say that, but sure, come in late, and take "a completion!" as your "proof". Oh no, I sorta mocked a crappy player. I'm glad you've never done that, or anyone else.

    Actually, the only difference is that I admit when I'm wrong, not when you feel like I should so you can win a really stupid argument. You're saying I should state you're right on something just because I disagree, and you can't see it any other way.

    If you want me to throw you a bone, you were there to absorb some of the comments I wouldn't have to make with you there. That said, you're widely hated for your jackass behavior, not because you tell someone they're wrong. You probably justify the behavior with the idea that people are going to hate you anyway, and I'm sure that's working out well for you.




    Of course it is. And who determines if your opinion is right? You do. Even Piper called you out on that self-serving mental masturbation.

    ROFL - "junior". I'm the same age you are. But condescending has always been your main weapon anyway, whether it holds water or not.
     
  8. FAN01

    FAN01 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 2, 2003
    I need a faster scroll button.
     
  9. kickazzz2000

    kickazzz2000 CURRENTLY ON THE CAN

    Age:
    47
    Posts:
    3,563
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Location:
    Doylestown, PA
    PgDwn worked well for me.
     
  10. magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    helps save wear on the mouse
     

Share This Page