1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

cuts - WTF?

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by magnus, Sep 2, 2006.

Page 10 of 12
  1. Sep 2, 2006 at 10:54 PM #91
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Yeah, I said that they usually had 7 DL active, but our fourth DT was just Moorehead back then. I just have a hard time seeing them bench Carstens for McCadam when we already have plenty of special teams tacklers. He adds nothing to the regular defense, and isn't necessary on special teams, whereas Carstens would presumably be used in a DT rotation along with Lewis. Inactivating another TE could work, though.
     
  2. Sep 2, 2006 at 11:05 PM #92
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    they kept 2 TE active most of last year. Some was injury (they wouldn't have Mangum inactive if they could help it).
    I assume your list had King inactive already.

    Wesley was inactive 3 games at the beginning of 04. Other than that, the only DB inactivity in 04 was Hawkins and Tillman being hurt, and when we'd pick up a new guy (who the fuck is J. Whitley?)
    I also didn't find much LB inactivity other than occasionally Allen, Fields once in 04, and the generic Morgan injuries, but we didn't keep 7 then.
     
  3. Sep 2, 2006 at 11:15 PM #93
    TAZZ

    TAZZ Member

    Posts:
    49
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Everyone did not see MCcadam even making the final 53
    Everyone did not see just 2 QB's in final 53
    Everyone did not see 4 TE's
    Everyone did not see 10 D-L's


    Yet Fox did all the above

    So for anyone at this point to ASSUME they have any idea what FOX is going to do next is FUNNY
     
  4. Sep 2, 2006 at 11:18 PM #94
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    it's always worthwhile to talk about it. If you're not around to talk about it, there's no point in being here.

    Some did see some of those things happening. I don't think anybody would expect 6 DTs, but I don't believe we're done.
     
  5. Sep 2, 2006 at 11:31 PM #95
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Gotta give WP some psychic props, read their minds on the QB situation.
     
  6. Sep 3, 2006 at 12:16 AM #96
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    I also called 4 TEs a month ago. Meanwhile McCadam is a mystery and 10 DLs is probably just until we can trade one.
     
  7. Sep 3, 2006 at 12:32 AM #97
    solarte1969

    solarte1969 ....

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    cutting thru the discussion....

    ARE YOU GUYS PLEASED WITH THE 53 AS IT IS NOW?
     
  8. Sep 3, 2006 at 12:42 AM #98
    stratocatter

    stratocatter Full Access Member

    Posts:
    11,383
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Wondering what it'll look like in a few days.
     
  9. Sep 3, 2006 at 2:48 AM #99
    Black&Blue

    Black&Blue NKW

    Age:
    79
    Posts:
    20,190
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    It's kind of been overlooked today, but I'm very happy about us keeping Shelton over Robertson. Very happy.


    There are some moves that I disagree with. Ciurciu over Adams. McCadam over Salley. Hankton over Hill. 4 TE's instead of 3 TE's and Cramer. But overall, I'm pleased with how the roster is shaping up. The only thing, imo, that we could potentially regret is letting go of Adams, but I don't think he would have made a huge impact this year, and Anderson could very well be the starter in '07.
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2006
  10. Sep 3, 2006 at 3:30 AM #100
    HardHarry

    HardHarry Rebel with a 401(k)

    Posts:
    8,909
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2003
    Location:
    Indie Kid
    No way. Given that I know absolutely shit about football, but i would have kept:

    Adams
    Biddle
    Bush
    Cramer

    & possibly Basanez.

    I don't get wtf we're doin. Half the guys we waived seem likely to be picked up before we can stick'em on the PS.

    Feels like the staff is deciding based on loyalty/seniority over common sense. I hate when GMs do shit like that.
     
Page 10 of 12

Share This Page