1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Current ACC Standings

Discussion in 'Charlotte Hornets' started by The Brain, Jan 10, 2005.

Page 3 of 3
  1. Jan 11, 2005 at 10:24 AM #21
    AlphaWolf

    AlphaWolf Full Access Member

    Age:
    45
    Posts:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Location:
    High Point, NC
    :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
     
  2. Jan 11, 2005 at 10:27 AM #22
    vpkozel

    vpkozel Professional Calvinballer

    Age:
    57
    Posts:
    35,060
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Wrong. The point was that State underachieves when they are supposed to be good. At least this has been the pattern since Sloan left. I thought that I clarifieed that pretty well with this post. Guess not.

     
  3. Jan 11, 2005 at 10:36 AM #23
    The Brain

    The Brain Defiler of Cornflakes

    Posts:
    32,125
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Over There ---->
    I think State underachieves when they're supposed to be good and overachieves when they are supposed to suck. Generally that normally keeps them middle of the pack... no pun intended. They continue to stay there. Honestly its really kinda odd.
     
  4. Jan 11, 2005 at 10:41 AM #24
    AlphaWolf

    AlphaWolf Full Access Member

    Age:
    45
    Posts:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Location:
    High Point, NC
    Some of that is true. However, being a State fan all my life and watching them since I could open my eyes, we haven't had but maybe 2-3 teams that were supposed to be really good. Usually, the Pack is picked to be anywhere between 3-6 in the ACC and that is usually where we finish. If people call that underachieving that is fine, I just have a different definition of the word I guess :huh:
    So my only point was that saying pretty much every team that was supposed to be good in the last 25 years is not so much an accurate statement.
     
  5. Jan 11, 2005 at 10:45 AM #25
    AlphaWolf

    AlphaWolf Full Access Member

    Age:
    45
    Posts:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Location:
    High Point, NC
    And hell, I think our 1983 story of overachievment should make up for ALL of the underachieving teams we may have had in the last 25 years. For a bunch of no names that had to win the conference tournament to even make it in the NCAA's and then knock off one of the best college teams assembled in Houston with Akeem and Drexler!! I'll take that story in our history with a couple of underachieving teams any day. I still get goose bumps when I see Jimmy V running around franticly looking for someone to hug. Amazing story.
     
  6. Jan 11, 2005 at 9:50 PM #26
    mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Sorry.
     
  7. Jan 12, 2005 at 12:52 AM #27
    AlphaWolf

    AlphaWolf Full Access Member

    Age:
    45
    Posts:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2005
    Location:
    High Point, NC
    Well, Miami screwed up our start to ACC play :(
     
Page 3 of 3

Share This Page