1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Cincinnati and the #1 pick

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Wp28, Dec 9, 2002.

  1. Dec 9, 2002 at 11:31 AM #1
    Wp28

    Wp28 Guest

    Seeing what I saw yesterday, Cincinnati isn't a lock to go QB with the #1 overall, They really need to trade out of #1 overall and get some damn defense. Kitna is not all world but he certainly isn't the biggest problem with that team.
     
  2. Dec 9, 2002 at 12:24 PM #2
    SandMan

    SandMan Guest

    They need a punter pretty bad :D - Maybe we give them Todd for Dillon... :cool:
     
  3. Dec 9, 2002 at 12:31 PM #3
    Piper

    Piper Guest

    I've read that they'd rather get a corner, thing was they could have done that last year.

    If Mike Brown keeps control, I can see him trading down and taking Woolfolk. But if he relents and gets a Pro GM, that GM is likely to want to build from the bottom. I wouldn't be suprised to see them try and deal Dillion.
     
  4. Dec 9, 2002 at 12:31 PM #4
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    defensively they should be better than they are. Defensive line could use some help, but corner in the first is certainly not viable. They could use Rogers, certainly. He'd possibly even bring Warrick's career up to being only bad rather than inhumane, and it's more offense to aid Dillon.

    Personally, with a new coach in there, I'd have to trade down, and make it priority to be the one on the block taking offers. I'd also entertain offers for Dillon, as well, if he's grousing about the new coach or the organization.
     
  5. Dec 9, 2002 at 12:37 PM #5
    LarryD

    LarryD autodidact polymath

    Posts:
    29,846
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Location:
    living the dream
    if rogers is there, warrick goes to no. 3.
     
  6. Dec 9, 2002 at 3:10 PM #6
    Louie

    Louie Guest

    I was at the game Sunday as well. I for one, I was really impressed with Kitna. I know that during the first half he was moving the ball at will. The Bengals also moved the ball ok in the 2nd half, but was limited to only one TD. They scored 31 points on our D. Kitna is a decent QB. I really doubt that Cincy uses their first pick on a QB. If I was Cincy I would be choosing some Defensive help. Maybe a WR, but their WR's could actually catch! I saw them make some unbelivable catches, so I am thinking they will go Defense in round one. But, maybe that is why they are in last place:D They will probably use their number one on a punter,hehe:p
     
  7. Dec 9, 2002 at 9:25 PM #7
    PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Guest

    Their corners were SORRY Artrell Jenkins? was toasted repeatedily and pushed off in the face mask several times
     
  8. Dec 10, 2002 at 1:07 AM #8
    CosmikCatNip

    CosmikCatNip Guest

    pointless speculation.
    bungles take a kicker with the number one pick, or better yet, trade the number one for a kicker.

    bungles will take a qb. it's been a few years since they wasted a pick on a qb. klingler...smith...the wacky draft wheel of fortune in the bengals office has stopped once more on the qb.
     

Share This Page