1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Chris Paul

Discussion in 'Charlotte Hornets' started by PantherPaul, Dec 8, 2011.

  1. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    The trade without Gordon was pretty nice value if you have to trade a superstar. Adding Gordon to all the other stuff including Minnesota's 1st was too much for Chris Paul.
     
  2. Superfluous_Nut

    Superfluous_Nut pastor of muppets

    Posts:
    33,932
    Likes Received:
    559
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    los angeles
    yeah, maybe they'll get somebody to bite on something like that, but i doubt it... they gotta hold out for a bit tho otherwise the veto of the lakers deal would look that much worse.
     
  3. PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,058
    Likes Received:
    2,783
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    Another trade agreed on supposidly with league approval? This one is without the pg the hornets wanted and they give cliPs two second rd picks? That's worse than the first Clipper Hornet trade proposal . NBA its fantastic!
     
  4. Superfluous_Nut

    Superfluous_Nut pastor of muppets

    Posts:
    33,932
    Likes Received:
    559
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    los angeles
    but the first clipper trade wasn't vetoed by the league, the clips said hell no.
     
  5. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    The one being floated around before didn't include Gordon, which was never realistic since the Hornets always demanded him.
     

Share This Page