1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Bob Johnson impresses me.

Discussion in 'Charlotte Hornets' started by The Brain, Jul 29, 2003.

  1. cantgetright

    cantgetright Full Access Member

    Age:
    47
    Posts:
    384
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    If your running for office the vote is binding- unlike the referendum which was nothing more than an opinion poll. Our leaders in our representitive democracy decided that only 57,000 people out of everyone in Charlotte cared enough to vote no- So everyone else either wanted it or didn't care enough one way or the other so they did what was best for the whole city and built the arena.
     
  2. sds70

    sds70 'King Kong Ain't Got **** On Me!!!!!'

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    12,770
    Likes Received:
    86
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Queen City of the Dirty South

    What was voted down was the bundling package (arena/AAA ballpark/museum improvements) . . . . The vote was non-binding anyhow, so the city easily could've said no to building it if the voters said yes . . .

    THis is similar to what happened in Phoenix with BANK ONE BALLPARK; The City leaders voted to build it sans voters approval and some folks complained about it. I guarantee you that most of the critics have been to at least 1 ball game or 1 event there since its opened . . . . Like I said earlier in another post, how come Mike Castano (GOP Mayor Candidate) is making this an issue :rolleyes: :rolleyes: ? ? ?
     
  3. Puttingood

    Puttingood Sensitive One

    Age:
    73
    Posts:
    26,308
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    The city spent 250,000 dollars to have a non-binding vote. Does this not scare some of you people? I understand what the non-binding meant when the vote was held and knew it was a farce to start with but does no one see anything wrong with a government that would spend tax-payers money for a non-binding vote.
    Building an arena is best for the whole city but what if the vote had been reversed and these same city council people had been against an arena ?
    Y'all blind if you don't see the doors that turkey shoot has opened up.
     
  4. sds70

    sds70 'King Kong Ain't Got **** On Me!!!!!'

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    12,770
    Likes Received:
    86
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Queen City of the Dirty South

    In a perfect world, there wouldn't be referundums . . . Politicans should have the stones to vote yes on a project like this . . Only reason they don't is they don't want to lose their seat on the council . . Just like the politicos in Phoenix did when they voted to build BANK ONE BALLPARK without a referendum; they looked at the overall benefit of having MLB in town and felt it outweighed the negative . .
     
  5. BUCKO

    BUCKO Full Access Member

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    8,025
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Actually, the Hornets paid for the referendum not the city.
     
  6. Puttingood

    Puttingood Sensitive One

    Age:
    73
    Posts:
    26,308
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Actually, the Hornets paid for the referendum not the city.


    Better check that-you part right. But you still 250 down bucko.;)
     
  7. mediafreak

    mediafreak Freak me

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    1,440
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    fyi

    buy tomorrow's paper.

    don't ask me why. just buy it.

    trust me.
     
  8. lj4three

    lj4three Resident Non-A-Rab

    Age:
    41
    Posts:
    6,111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC, USA
    putt makes a good point, if you look at the subject objectively. however, i agree with sds where this should have never been a public poll- too much emotion was involved and it superceded logic, IMO.
     
  9. mediafreak

    mediafreak Freak me

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    1,440
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Re: fyi

    take a look at this
    http://www.nba.com/bobcats/past_season_ticket_holders.html

    it's in tomorrow's paper.

    tickets for the first year will be 15-30 bucks more at the Hive. You know, the one the Hornets left.
     
  10. mediafreak

    mediafreak Freak me

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    1,440
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    sorry

    bosses don't hand down SBJ. :(
     

Share This Page