1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones

Discussion in 'Music Forum' started by chipshot, Aug 4, 2003.

  1. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Beatles.
     
  2. Nytdreamer

    Nytdreamer Ex-pizza Slut

    Age:
    43
    Posts:
    2,750
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    AR
    I think Stones vs. Aerosmith would've been more realistic, Beatles would be more comparable to the Monkees
     
  3. reb

    reb 1riot1reb

    Posts:
    31,047
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    juicy part of the mountains
    .
     
  4. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    That's just stupid.
     
  5. Nytdreamer

    Nytdreamer Ex-pizza Slut

    Age:
    43
    Posts:
    2,750
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    AR
    hardly, comparing beatles and stones is apples and oranges, you got songs like Hey Jude against songs like Paint it Black, totally different sounds... unless you are deaf...
     
  6. Piper

    Piper phishin member

    Age:
    51
    Posts:
    8,329
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Yer Blues has a very Stonsey sound. Come Together, the Ballad of John and Yoko as well.


    The Monkey's weren't even a band. They were a creation who copied "She Loves You" while Lennon was writing "I am the Walrus." That's so stupid, even math can spot it.

    :)
     
  7. chipshot

    chipshot Full Access Member

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Boise
    I think Their Satanic Majesties Request as well as other old Stones is very easy to compare to Beatles.
     
  8. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    I don't think the premise of these threads is to compare the bands in the title, but to give your opinion of which you prefer.

    And let's remember who wrote the Stones' first single.:D
     
  9. Nytdreamer

    Nytdreamer Ex-pizza Slut

    Age:
    43
    Posts:
    2,750
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    AR
    Of course they weren't, I wasn't trying to say they were any real comparison to the Beatles, I was only making a point that they had more of a Beatles sound than Stones ever had, even if they weren't a real band and never played their own instruments. (I only said Monkees because I couldn't think of anyone else off hand that had a similar sound to the Beatles.) I just can't even begin to compare Beatles to Stones, they might have a couple songs that could be compared to the others style, but on whole it's more of a choice to which kind of rock has a better sound to you.

    (And I know very well there is no comparison between Monkees and Beatles, but I still can't think of any bands that really are comparable to Beatles.)
     
  10. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Because there aren't!

    You gonna change your vote now?;)
     

Share This Page