1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Bears QB Situation

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by The Brain, Jan 22, 2003.

Page 2 of 3
  1. Jan 22, 2003 at 9:26 PM #11
    HeadCase

    HeadCase dazed and confused

    Posts:
    3,106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    >> Fox did talk to 3 QBs at the Senior Bowl

    i'd heard simms and palmer. who was the other. i'll guess Ragone since he'd be my last choice.
     
  2. Jan 22, 2003 at 10:29 PM #12
    McFly41

    McFly41 Work Hard...PLAY HARDER!

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    11,852
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    IOWA
    I could see King in Chi-town, but not Plummer. I still expect the Bears to try to move up to #1 and get Palmer.
     
  3. Jan 22, 2003 at 11:08 PM #13
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    I believe it was Boller, thank God.
     
  4. Jan 22, 2003 at 11:26 PM #14
    twinks

    twinks Full Access Member

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    2,116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    I think Plummer would be great in Chicago. he's tough and smart. the bears need that. King doens't have enough experience the pack and vikes will eat him alive....
     
  5. Jan 22, 2003 at 11:31 PM #15
    McFly41

    McFly41 Work Hard...PLAY HARDER!

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    11,852
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    IOWA
    Ya, he's tough...but look at his TD/INT ratio and tell me how smart he is.
    The only reason I could see King there is the connection, otherwise, I say they go after Palmer.
     
  6. Jan 22, 2003 at 11:34 PM #16
    twinks

    twinks Full Access Member

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    2,116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Look at the team he was playing for, I would throw it to the other team too.

    but seriously, I don't like those kinds of stats....not all INT's are the quarterback's fault. I'd give him a shot in Chicago, what have they got to lose??
     
  7. Jan 22, 2003 at 11:40 PM #17
    McFly41

    McFly41 Work Hard...PLAY HARDER!

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    11,852
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    IOWA
    I would agree that his ratio skews more towards the negative than he really is, but he does make some really bad decisions w/ the ball.
    Either way, the Bears need both a FA and a rookie. Otherwise, they'll be paying their medical staff triple time just to work on their QB's again, and McCaskey is a notorious tight ass.
     
  8. Jan 23, 2003 at 9:57 AM #18
    twinks

    twinks Full Access Member

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    2,116
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2003
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    I guess I'm just nervous about them using a first round pick to get a QB. I still have a bitter taste in my mouth from that whole Cade McNown thing.
     
  9. Jan 23, 2003 at 4:35 PM #19
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    I really thought Chandler would play better for them. I do not think King or Plummer has the arm to be the guy for the Bears. They need a guy with a strong arm who can throw the long ball. King and Plummer are both better suited to the dink and dunk.

    I would try to get Palmer if I were the Bears. They need a lot of help on offense.
     
  10. Jan 23, 2003 at 4:51 PM #20
    SandMan

    SandMan A Man Of Trust

    Age:
    61
    Posts:
    5,072
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    here
    Sounds like us...
     
Page 2 of 3

Share This Page