1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Any info on UNC/Mike Copeland?

Discussion in 'Charlotte Hornets' started by UNCfever, Aug 4, 2005.

  1. UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    True about the depth part, but I would take it at this point. TH and Sanders I would guess are the starters at this point, so if Copeland can give each of these guys a rest, it would work for a year.

    I guess UNC could do the old dook trick and play one big man with 3 little guys and a SF running around the court at times. Of course not sure they have any other options.

    I wonder if Grant will ever play ball again. Not sure 2 knee transplants would get him there.
     
  2. The Brain

    The Brain Defiler of Cornflakes

    Posts:
    32,125
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Over There ---->
    Actually the starting lineup will probably be
    PG - Quentin Thomas (though Frasor may take it from him)
    SG - Danny Green
    SF - Reyshawn Terry
    PF - David Noel
    C - Tyler Hansbrough
     
  3. smashmouth5

    smashmouth5 Fly Eagles Fly

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    3,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Wrapped around their fingers
    So you think that's the line-up that Gardner Webb is going into Chapel Hill to beat. :imagestor
     
  4. UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Agreed!
     
  5. The Brain

    The Brain Defiler of Cornflakes

    Posts:
    32,125
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Over There ---->
    got ours last year... gonna take a year off and make it easy for the dookies... if they can't win this one they're pathetic.
     
  6. sockittome16

    sockittome16 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    3,080
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2003
    Fraser should definitely start over Thomas. Thomas had more fouls than assists or points, and from what I hear Frasier is suppose to be a pretty good guard
     
  7. UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003

    Damn, you just made Thomas sound like Shav. :banginghe :banginghe :banginghe

    It's gonna be a long year!
     
  8. The Brain

    The Brain Defiler of Cornflakes

    Posts:
    32,125
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Over There ---->
    problem is with Frasor though is that he's more of a tweener guard. If he's a PG that can play some SG then the team will be pretty good, but I have a feeling he's SG that can play some PG, but I guess if necessary it can get the team by for a year until Lawson comes in.
     
  9. UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Well Copeland is official now per insidecarolina.com
     

Share This Page