1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Any Holes Left on the Team?

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by 45catfan, May 3, 2006.

  1. 45catfan

    45catfan Wheat Beer Connoisseur

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    991
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2003
    Location:
    Hour north of the enemy
    With the off-season acquisitions essentially finished, are there any glaring holes left on the team or is everyone comfortable where the Panthers stand personnel-wise?

    I feel that there are no glaring holes, but I would feel better with more talent at the starting strong safety slot, strong-side linebacker position and at tight end. I still think we could have better talent at reserve offensive tackle too. Besides that, I think we are pretty much set. I realize that no team is EVER 100% set or satisfied with their roster, but as for fans, we can dream of having the flawless roster.
     
  2. Black&Blue

    Black&Blue NKW

    Age:
    78
    Posts:
    20,190
    Likes Received:
    6
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    I think you've pretty much nailed it. The safety and linebacker spots need to be clarified, but we have good players to work with.

    I'd like to see us set at KR. Smart was bad, Robertson wasn't much better, and the only other guys who appear to be capable, Marshall and Williams, haven't done it in the NFL. So I'd consider that a question mark.
     
  3. Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    I do not think we have any glaring holes. We have some depth issues but there is not team that does not have that problem.

    Areas of concern are minimal in my opinion:

    SLB - our hodge podge of guys will yield a starter who is no worse than Short was last year

    WLB - Davis should be good and if he falters we have some options.

    FS - Branch should be about as good as McCree was, better in coverage weaker in run support so it should net out. Williams is a wild card who might pan out.

    TE - same old guys doing the same old crap no change here really. We are not going to feature a tight end as long as Henning runs the offense.

    We have had big upgrades at #2 wideout, DT and Center and running back depth. We may see improvement at guard and nickel corner.
     
  4. The Brain

    The Brain Defiler of Cornflakes

    Posts:
    32,125
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Over There ---->
    I'm not sure that Branch won't be playing SS this year if he's starting.
     
  5. rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003

    I used to call for that but it got shot down at the time . .. really can't remember why
    My friend the long time Ohio State fan here at work today was talikng up Salley and thinks he will be an excellent SS for us if given a couple of years to adjust to the pro level speed and reads. From the looks of his 40 times he is too slow but my friend says he plays faster than his 40 times . . . says he is a HUGE hitter.)

    BTW - I'm hoping he (or ANYONE) can replace Hankton on special teams . . . please
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2006
  6. CelticCat

    CelticCat ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED

    Posts:
    3,964
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    I wonder if we'll hear that "shake your Sally" song at BOA?:satana:
     
  7. hasbeen99

    hasbeen99 Fighting the stereotype

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Clovis, CA
    Holes? No, I wouldn't say there are holes. There are a few question marks, though.

    KR -- Smitty is the safeguard, but nobody is wishing for that anymore. The hope is that one of the rookies (preferrably Marshall) can take over for Robertson.

    PR -- Again, Smitty is the fallback but we really need it to be Marshall, Gamble, or someone else we don't know about yet.

    SS/FS -- Can Branch handle it? Shaun Williams would probably be the #3 safety, and will probably be serviceable if Branch isn't up for it.

    OLB -- Davis in a brand new position at WLB is a question mark. SLB is WIDE open. I don't remember having such a blank slate at a position before. I don't know that there's even a favorite going in. I'm rooting for Seward to win the job, and I think he can. But until it shakes out on the field, we just don't know.

    DT -- The question is what kind of shape Jenks is going to be in, and how far along in his recover he really is. There are bodies we can throw at the position this year, and they'll be better insurance than we had last year, but until we see Kris in pads, we won't know what DT is really going to look like.

    OG -- This may be my greatest area of concern. The staff is more or less gambling on Mathis to be a red chip starter, at least. There's not much backing him (or Wahle) up.
     
  8. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    I think Donnalley was the last Hole to play for the Panthers.
     
  9. QC REPRESENT

    QC REPRESENT Full Access Member

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    5,030
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003

    Peppers, but good try:imagestor
     
  10. mathmajors

    mathmajors Roll Wave

    Age:
    54
    Posts:
    42,103
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Well now I just feel stupid. :banginghe:
     

Share This Page