Alright it's prediction time in MLB

Look shitstain, it's not my fault you jumped into this thread without looking at the previous posts. Someone did in fact predict Pujols would be the best ever. I disagreed. Then along comes your dumb ass, slobbering all over Albert's knob, saying he's the best this and he's the best that. And now you're mad because I don't agree with your assessment of his abilities.

You go ahead and gush over how wonderful Pujols is. I'll reserve judgment until he's played more than four fucking years.

As for not being able to comprehend the written word, you really should look in the mirror. Better yet, go back and re-read the thread. have someone else read it to you (slowly) if that's what it takes. You'll find not a single incident where I disparaged Pujols abilities. He's good. Really, really good.

that's not what you said fucktard. you said he had the best first four years ever. keep changing your story, it's doing wonders for your credibility.

Incidentally, here it is:

So it's in baseball American and "similar publications" huh? Been repeated on "sports programming"? Well, Ted Williams had a better first four years. Much better. so what does that say about Baseball America, similar publications and those who've repeated it on sports programming? It tells me, if they can overlook the greatest hitter of all time, that they don't know a whole fuckuva lot.

Kinda like you, ya fucking stoolpushing assbag.

 

You might think that, but it's exactly what my office said to me last year during my fourth year here.

They just knew.

 

Your talent for screwing up and being a lazy ass makes you a prodigy. That's different.

 

Now this is worthy of a signature

 

has Pujol's age ever been confirmed? He looks about 30 to me.

Grid, you made a good point about Arod, Griffey, etc. whom people were annointing the best ever at one time too.

Albert's good, and he might eventually be the greatest to ever play the game statistically, sure...but there's a long way to go, and injuries, drugs, ex-wive's burning down houses, and all sorts of other bad things can happen.

 

haha
:bananalam

 

As PP clarified, he was suggesting the possibility. It isn't unreasonable, though you pretend otherwise.

I never asked you to agree that Pujols will be the best ever. What I asked what that you be reasonable and not criticize PP for having his opinion when it isn't without merit.

Yes, not even you are that stupid, but what you did do was to attack PP and subsequently me for suggesting that Pujols isn't just "very good." Even now with the comparison to Ted Williams you can't even admit that Pujols is an extraordinary hitter. (And if you can actually manage to get cable in the porta-john you call a home, take note that ESPN mentioned how Pujols hasn't struck out yet this season after not striking out all spring either.)

http://www.pacbellpark.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/news/mlb_news.jsp?ymd=20040926&content_id=872306&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp

In case you can't muster the intelligence to click on a link, here is one of the more relevant portions:

"(Pujols is) the only player in history with 30 or more homers in each of his first four seasons. He's sure to end this year as the only one with a .300 average, 30-plus homers, 100-plus runs and 100-plus RBIs in each of his first four full seasons."

I did agree with you that Ted Williams' first four look better overall, especially when you factor in runs scored, and I also suggested that when people called Albert the best ever after four years, they probably held it against Williams that he didn't hit 30 homers in his second year. So yeah, I agreed with you that Williams looks like the best first four years ever, which would make Pujols at worst the second best first four years ever. And yet even with that you still cannot bring yourself to admit that he's not just "very good," but extraordinary.

I think you've forgotten who you are dealing with. I think because I haven't been spewing obscenities that you think you can somehow come out of this without sewing your face to my crotch, but I happen to believe you're wrong about that. Why?

Because you're a walking semen stain without the ability to focus long enough to grasp reality in the first place. You've had so much rotten cock stuffed up your various holes that you leave a wet spot every time you sit down. With those kinds of distractions it's easy to understand why you would have difficulty comprehending and subsequently endorsing basic facts. Granted, if I had to eat with rubber gloves just to keep another man's pubes out of my food, I might come online and wax poetic about "the good ol' days." Of course, when you spend your days at Weight Watchers meetings licking the juice out of rotten crotch just to pay the bills, any pre-sodomy days would seem golden.

But here's a newsflash, junior, your inability to attend "real school" and thus acquire the necessary skills to count isn't an excuse for your comments. Being the drugged up spawn of two retards is not justification for infecting the public forum with your idiocy. I'm sure if you simply turned off the computer and wiped away some of the drool, the kind people here could hold a telethon in your honor. We might even be able to buy you one of those nice new statistics books where you can look at all the pretty numbers and hope that perhaps some actual knowledge of baseball might sink in.

I have a reputation, grid, and I happen to think that my anger management issues have something to do with living in a world with vaginal discharge such as yourself. I may be wrong, but that's my working hypothesis. Meanwhile you have your own, somewhat similar rep that goes years back. Perhaps one of the major differences between us is that I actually have something intelligent to say in addition to all that bile. Meanwhile your noted accomplishments are "Anything's possible" and "How 'bout I jack off on Albert's rookie card" Great contributions to be sure, but not exactly the kind of legacy your kids would have trouble living up to. Of course that's assuming you'd ever have kids, which for you would require #1) clubbing or drugging a female into unconsciousness, and #2) hocking up enough of another man's semen and spitting it into the requisite orifice to compensate for having no working organ of your own.

But forgive me, I'm getting off track. The point is that you took it upon yourself to chastize PP for his appreciation of Pujols. It wasn't just that you disagreed with him, because it's understandable that many people would, but that you acted like he was crazy for saying what he did. The fact that you lack the intellectual ability to understand that someone second only to Ted Williams is something more than "anything" just shows how completely useless not only this discussion is, but absolutely anything that manages to come from your infected little fingers.

So how about you save us the trouble of another rebuttal where you continue refusing to acknowledge that Pujols is an extraordinary hitter, and amuse yourself by pulling another gob of feces out of your oversized ass.

 

Collin is an assbag

 

yeah, I wonder if he'd have those same anger management problems if he was talking to someone in person. Someone that could punch his face in, for instance.

On another note, perhaps this forum needs a mod that isn't MIA.

 

i feel violated