All's right with the world

Intangibles? Are we talking about Reyshawn Terry? Have you EVER watched a UNC game?

I disagree with your opinion.

 

Lets see here, we miss the D that wright provided last year without a doubt. I am guessing you didn't watch much UNC basketball if you think we miss Terry. He was VERY inconsistant, so no big loss there.

Considering Hansbrough, Ellington, Lawson, Green have improved a lot from lasst year with Thompson, Ginyard and Stepheson (Thomas - while Lawson out) taking up minutes and not hurting the team UNC has more than made up for the O part of the game and is even better on O.

Leadership is pretty much a wash, while there isn't a step up player that is extremely vocal, I just didn't see Terry as that either. That roll really needs to be Hansbrough/Green imo.

The main issue has been D this year and has improved some as the year has gone on, it still isn't consistant with lapses or the players just seem not sure what to do at times. The main thing with Wright is that he could block shots and the best interior defender by far.

 

Terry hit some big shots and had some big games down the stretch for you guys....Im not trying to start a pissing contest, just discussion.

Like I said...Wright provided you both O and D while in the Game.....Thompson is the O option and Stepheson is your D option......Wright could replace Hans and you didnt lose much....Neither of the others can replace Hans for an extended period this year....Thus you have seen an increase in his MPG....

 

and unc ALMOST beat Duke in Chapel Hill this year. This team is not as good as last year's team. The only reason their record is better is because last year the ACC was up with 7 teams going dancing and this year outside of Duke (who UNC lost to) and Clemson (who UNC's gone to 3 OT's on in 2 games) who's pretty good the ACC is a bunch of bubble teams from 4 to about 8 or 9 and the bottom teams are pretty weak. The RPI saying the ACC #1 makes me think that the RPI is a bunch of crap.

 

2006/2007 - 2007/2008 season thus far

Game averages

points --------- 85.7 - 90.1
rebounds ------ 40.8 - 44.4
assists -------- 18.3 - 17.0
to's ----------- 13.8 - 14.7
steals --------- 8.1 - 8.7
blocks --------- 4.6 - 4.4
FG% ---------- .499 - .484
FT% ---------- .712 - .761
3pt% --------- .358 - .373
PPS ----------- 1.37 - 1.36

 

I guess thats why they don't pay you to think or vote and you just have to settle with the rest of us and post on here.

Still a lot of basketball to go so this could change a lot, but currently they have 6 ACC team going to the dance.

 

What 6?

UNC
Duke
Clemson
Miami
UMD (doubtful)
VT (if they their last game yes) very weak schedule....their ACC Schedule was the weakeast...

5 at best. no way 6.

 

The current bracket is listed on ESPN, but I realize that could change easily with upsets and teams getting automatic bids that shouldn't.

 

last i checked, ESPN did not make the brackets...hell they dont even get to announce them until CBS gets them first.....While i enjoy reading Lunardi, he really only uses raw data to make those choices.....I do not think the committee will give the ACC 6 bids.

UMD has some bad losses and only 1 good win (UNC)

VTs schedule was weak (but they have played their way in had they lost to Wake i give UMD the edge)

Miami is in by virtue of their solid play of late and the Duke win.

 

http://proxy.espn.go.com/ncb/bracketology

They update it daily.