1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

4.4 fucking seconds?

Discussion in 'Charlotte Hornets' started by wossa, Jan 25, 2007.

  1. Wise One

    Wise One No Doubt

    Posts:
    5,113
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Location:
    State of Confusion
    BRRP

    :beer:
     
  2. slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    What?

    Comments like this do nothing but prove the rabid idiocy of the Hole fanbase.
     
  3. solarte1969

    solarte1969 ....

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    I have no dog in this fight, but Duke should have been looking at 2.5 seconds on the clock (at most), rather than 4.4.

    Plenty of time to score, still, but when the ACC publicly acknowledges a "timing error" occurred, there is something to all the griping.

    Would Duke have scored in 2.5 sceonds? Maybe, but thats a moot point now.
     
  4. slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    No one has denied a timing error.

    But if you want to complain about timing. Duke should have had more than 2.5 because the clock didn't stop correctly on the made two.

    Where do you draw the line?
     
  5. solarte1969

    solarte1969 ....

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    on the made 2, if you want to split hairs, Duke should have had 5.2 seconds--.2 is not enough time to shoot the ball, so it is negligable. The fact the clock clearly did not start on that goofy giveaway was horrible, and it does provide the consipracy theorists with ammunition.

    Still, if Duke doesn't throw it right to the guy at the top of the ring, we don't talk about any clock delays or issues today.

    I don't know where to draw the line, but don't the ACC refs have that timing device on them like the NBA guys do?
     
  6. slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    Only the idiotic ones...the delay favored Clemson just as much as it did Duke.
     
  7. solarte1969

    solarte1969 ....

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    well, I won't editorialize like that, but I agree....Duke might not have scored in the final 2.5 and ended up in OT, where it's anybody's guess what happens there.
     
  8. slydevl

    slydevl Asshole for the People!

    Age:
    52
    Posts:
    29,009
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2002
    Location:
    Madagascar
    Had Clemson missed the shot and got the rebound who would the clock failing to start have benefitted?

    If McClure had missed the shot would it have benefitted Duke?

    As you can see, you cannot logically define the benefit based upon the outcome. It was a benefit to both teams and both teams capitalized on it.

    Duke just happened to win on their capitalization because they had played better up until that point.

    As far as conspiracy theories? You'd basically have to say the time keeper was betting on Clemson hitting a 3 (40%) and then Duke scoring in 4.4 seconds (i'll be generous and say that is 50% since Duke is so fucking good). YEah, I think it would be brilliant of the time keeper to gamble on a 20% chance. Lunacy. Sheer fucking lunacy.
     
  9. UNCfever

    UNCfever Full Access Member

    Posts:
    8,254
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Errr, sly, the clock does not always favor the team that is behind and you know that or at least I hope you are smart enough to realize that with your fine dook education. The play where Clemson shot the 3, didn't take 5 seconds, so no, it gave them no advantage of time needed to make the play, it did however give dook the time needed to make the play that they did run at the end of the game, the LAST play.
     
  10. solarte1969

    solarte1969 ....

    Age:
    55
    Posts:
    14,842
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Charlotte
    Again, I am not taking sides--just presenting my opinion on the deal.
     

Share This Page