presidence99

[IMG]

[IMG]

[IMG]

Minnesota plays down to the opponent.

http://www.thisboardrocks.com/forum/member.php?u=5969

I pick on the guy to you but generally I'd prefer he actually play well. It's good he played against Tampa, but he came off the bench because he's behind Moose on the depth chart.
The bottom line is he doesn't get open.

So Fisher's out of a job this year - think he's worth a flier? It's the similar coach with a new outlook type idea. Since realistically our guy's out too.

kids on the huddle are all going with the "Dwayne Jarrett is a great receiver but he's not getting a chance" argument within the "John Fox isn't giving Dwayne Jarrett a chance" argument.
Thoughts?

yeah, that's the thing with Cassell. We really going to run more than 50% of snaps out of no-huddle?

Campbell is OK. That's fine. He's terrible there but you can say it's scheme. And coaching. I'd rather not but our options won't be much better than him.

Good point about the TE.

Tolbert, the FB.

Dumervil's two sacks have been with his hand on the ground in obvious rushing situations.

That's where he, Kampmann make up a lot of ground in the 3-4. A big weakness of a lot of 3-4 teams ends up being putting your best rush guys in a 3-point in nickel. You're suddenly pushing two-gap inside guys as penetrators and outside guys used to standing on the edge, are suddenly crouched.
I'd spread a 3-4 all day, make them play out of their comfort zone.

I don't think that much of Campbell.
But I don't have a good answer for what to do either. Plenty of people thought all we needed is a Leftwich or Culpepper, and I mean some might still be able to say that. But guys of that caliber are available for gruesome reasons. And Campbell will be too - with less talent than Culpepper or Leftwich.