1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Saints are in deep

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by The Cat, Mar 2, 2012.

  1. King o' Farts

    King o' Farts Full Access Member

    Posts:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    The DC is new and was overhauling anyway. The O might drop back some but still has the same players and OC. Playcalling will change some with payton gone but the O will remain much better than average.

    Goodell did what any commish hsold have done. He penalized them for the initial violation and ramped it up for the cover up. In any case, this was NOWHERE near the NCAA death penalty.
     
  2. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    You're way off base on this one. Payton & Loomis lied to Goodell and obstructed an investigation by the league office. A lengthy suspension was completely warranted for both.
     
  3. Water Boy

    Water Boy Put me in, Coach

    Posts:
    224
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    At the cost of possibly setting a franchise back multiple seasons? Call me Don Quixote but I think it is akin to a criminal being punished more for the obstruction of justice than for the actual crime. Overkill fueled by ego...
     
  4. presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,521
    Likes Received:
    2,690
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    I wouldn't call it obstruction of justice so much as cops catch you comitting a crime, you get released on bail and get caught committing the same crime again before your first trial starts. I mean the coverup was meant to let them keep doing it after they'd been caught how can you not come down harder on that?

    Also SMU was banned from postseason play IIRC saints are still a likely playoff team to me.
     
  5. King o' Farts

    King o' Farts Full Access Member

    Posts:
    432
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    SMU was banned for postseason play for more than 1 year, 3 or 4 I believe. They had an entire season cancelled, home games for another season cancelled and ultimately cancelled the away games for that season themselves. They got put on probation for paying players and then busted for the same violation while on probation. Water Boy is a total moron id he thinks anything that has been put on the Saints approaches that, which is widely referred to as the NCAA death peanalty.
     
  6. Water Boy

    Water Boy Put me in, Coach

    Posts:
    224
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Point taken...

    I stated it was the NFL's equivalent to the NCAA's Death Penalty. No way would the NFL ban one of its own franchises. The Saints punishment is unprecedented in the NFL. As SMU's was (and still is) in the NCAA. That's the crux of my comparison.
     
  7. Abusive

    Abusive Fuck yo blanket

    Posts:
    11,183
    Likes Received:
    1,542
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    No.
    Biased fans? Never!

    Seriously, the Williams audio was all I needed to hear. I've never been in an NFL team meeting, but I know (and have since spoken to) several who have. Players.

    To a man, they all say it's about the worst thing they've ever heard. Not so much the language--and that shit doesn't bug me. The specificity with which Dr. Cheat instructed his players to target specific players, and specific portions of their anatomy, was out of bounds.

    Sure, this probably happened a lot back in the 70's. You know, back when the game was played at about 70% the speed/power to current day NFL. Times evolve, and the concern about concussions is valid. I don't agree with some of the league policies regarding in-game penalties, but I do agree with the concept of not letting Laron Landry hit like Jack Tatum.

    Oh, and, the blatant deceit and misdirection from Payton/Loomis/Williams about the entire issue during the investigation is another element in itself. One thing the boss hates more that bad behavior is a cover-up of bad behavior.

    If this was my team, I would probably huff and puff like a bitch too, because the penalty is severe. But, then again, perhaps this speaks to an overall organizational culture. Tom Benson, before Katrina, was seen by most in his city as a piece of shit. Then, they got Brees and some weapons and won a ton of games, broke a ton of records, and the city loves that umbrella-twirling cunt.

    Not for a second do I believe that Benson wasn't aware of some of what was going on, if not all of it.

    A lot of people are wrong about a lot of things, with respect to predicting the future. (See: Newton, Cam). The Saints may completely glide right past this on talent alone, and win 10 games. But they're not doing anything to lock up their franchise quarterback, and without that--as we have seen--it's an average to below-average operation.
     
  8. Abusive

    Abusive Fuck yo blanket

    Posts:
    11,183
    Likes Received:
    1,542
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    No.
    This offense was somewhat unprecedented, to be fair. It's not as if Goodell has a barometer of past offenses similar to this. No doubt, it's harsh. But playing a game of high-stakes goon-poker with ACL's and heads (documented on tape) stretches a tad beyond obstruction.

    Obstruction, in this case, is simply the follow-up crime to the crime.
     
  9. Mills51

    Mills51 Full Access Member

    Posts:
    475
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
  10. PantherSoCo

    PantherSoCo I don't have sleeves

    Age:
    49
    Posts:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Location:
    Bakersfield CA
    Maybe the Saints need to change their name...

    I just don't know what kind of penalty you can apply to this (provided it's true) that hasn't been doled out already. Take a bigger share of their TV revenue? How many second chances do you give them?
     

Share This Page