Coach of the year

Lol. This thread has been hilarious. I would argue though, that ethics shouldnt have a bearing on where a team is ranked. I dont give a hoot about ethics, never have really. Id rather win dirty than lose clean anyday.


And the only thing Id point out about losing the Chicago game, is that Delhomme's INTS werent from pressure. They were just bad reads, bad throws, whatever, but they didnt stem from pressure. I wish they did.

 

Agreed on Delhomme.

It's not that I am outraged by Denver's ethics. I just think Atlanta has proved you can throw a couple of hacks in the there and get just as much out of the line as you can with 5 pro bowlers.

Denver's line is not physical. Excluding Foster, they are undersized, quick. To me, Kansas City, Seattle, Pittsburgh (healthy), Indy, and Chicago are more effective, powerful lines. Indy is close on par with Denver in terms of overall size, but they are better overall than Denver.

 

Denver's offensive line has always been undersized and quick, but they've been dominant for the last decade. I applaud the valiant attempt to justify your whacky rankings, though.

 

I think denver's o line has excelled because of scheme, which actually requires strong, athletic fast O linemen, and a good cut back rb.

 

Dungy is a lock for Coach of the Year

 

Did anyone see Tampa winning the South?

 

fixed