Sorry folks, but Moose is expendable.

The proof that's all over every single fucking argument we've had about it, where you've argued blindly for Dan Henning and against every single stat anyone's shown you. One of the threads (hilarity - it's another Moose thread) is on the first page. And there was no successful rebuttal to it, only "well, maybe we'll do better with depth." I'm not going to argue something fifty times in fifty venues, it's right there for you.

 

We played specifically conservative. We were beating Philadelphia regardless. I'm asserting that we typically make games closer than they have to be, just because we lay up and let them get back in games. Philly didn't get back in that game because they didn't have McNabb.

 

I'll just repost that in hopes that BB&T can get his links straight - dude, it's okay, just give up posting the Seifert pic. It's not relevant and not terribly worth the effort.







Past that, I'm out of this thread. I've had enough suppositions and "what-if" and misdirection to suit a point that has nothing to do with the damn discussion for one day. I can't wait for draft talk, when people can at least wait for me to say what I'm thinking before they misinterpret it. I'll leave you to have your panties bunched on your own.

 

You are the almighty Magnus, message board moderator and ameteur draft expert.

I am merely a fan with a different perspective.

My arguments with you are done, because when you try to debate with Magnus, you never engage. You are just told how ignorant you are and how knowledgable he is.

So, assuming you don't ban me, you will never hear a peep out of me again as far as a dialouge goes. I will just continue to blindly promote "The Henning Way" and listen to your constant bitchting and moaning about how one player (Branch) is the reason our defense gives up any big play.

Goodnight, Mags. It was fun while it lasted.

 

Never called you ignorant, never said anything about myself, and again, you're telling me what I think. The fun part is, not only does it show your frustration, but you're always way off. I never said Branch is the reason our D gives up every play.

I just can't be held responsible for dramaticism and exaggeration. Of course, I'd rather stomp off angry than try to rebut the "Henning wears down backs" argument, it's a pretty good one.

 

he does suck. Greg Favors sucked, but he wasn't the blame for everything, either. It's a logical fallacy.

 

You are the expert in that department.

 

Logic? Thanks.
of course, it took you seven minutes to come up with that, so who's to say, right?