1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Trading the #9?

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Wp28, Mar 26, 2012.

Page 5 of 6
  1. Mar 29, 2012 at 7:05 PM #41
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    No one had Gabbert as a first rounder at the end of the college season. It was only when Luck decided to stay that he suddenly rocketed up draft boards.
     
  2. Mar 29, 2012 at 8:16 PM #42
    PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,047
    Likes Received:
    2,783
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    I think a lot will depend on Cleveland's pick. I am reading that they may take Tannehill. If that happens then we ought to get either Claiborne,or Couples. Assuming Cleveland does take him and that's an assumption how about
    Cleveland-Tannehill
    Tampa Bay- Richardson
    Rams- Blackmon
    Jaguars- the one I don't know. They need receivers as well and I could see them taking Floyd who a lot of people see as very similar to Blackmon (NFL.com Cassell). If not Floyd then maybe they go D-line in Ingram or Couples
    Miami- if Cleveland takes Tannehill then they could take whomever the Jags didn't take in Couple or Ingram
    Carolina- then takes Claiborne


    Hopefully
     
  3. Mar 29, 2012 at 9:17 PM #43
    Temporary

    Temporary Former Member

    Posts:
    19
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2012
    Location:
    Incognito
    Since the Panthers don't have a 3rd round pick. IF they do trade down, might be nice to get a 3rd rnd or high 4th out of it.

    But can the Panthers aford it? They are close to the cap now. FO better get busy and restructure some salaries, or cuts, or trades.


    This as of March 13th!

    Listed below: Salary cap numbers for all 32 NFL teams, as of 12:01 a.m. ET Tuesday, according to league source.
    (Note: This does not include any cap penalties against Dallas or Washington and does not account for releases and restructurings completed Monday. Those numbers will be figured in Tuesday, along with additional cuts and contracts.)

    Arizona: -$13.7 million (they’re over)
    Atlanta: $7M
    Baltimore: $13M
    Buffalo: $23M
    Carolina: $1.3M
    Chicago: $23.5M
    Cincinnati: $39M
    Cleveland: $15M
    Dallas: -$2.7M (they’re over)
    Denver: $42.3M
    Detroit: -$7.3M (they’re over)
    Green Bay: $5.6M
    Houston: $615,000
    Indinapolis: $13.1M
    Jacksonville: $34.5M
    Kansas City: $22.3M
    Miami: $9.8M
    Minnesota: $24M
    New England: $15.5M
    New Orleans: $6M
    New York Giants: $1.6M
    New York Jets: $13M
    Oakland: $640,000
    Philadelphia: $13.9M
    Pittsburgh: $1.8M
    San Diego: $16.3M
    Seattle: $27.7M
    San Francisco: $20.7M
    St. Louis: $9.8M
    Tampa Bay: $44.9M
    Tennessee: $25.1M
    Washington: $16.4M
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2012
  4. Mar 29, 2012 at 9:23 PM #44
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Would be nice, but I can't see any realistic scenario in which Claiborne falls to #9. Coples could.
     
  5. Mar 30, 2012 at 12:08 PM #45
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    If there's any kind of market for Stewart then I could really get behind trading him and taking Richardson at #9. That dude is a beast, and RBs are the most undervalued position by teams right now (although I guess that would hurt Stewart's trade value). Given the lack of great defensive options at #9, it seems like a legitimate choice especially considering his abilities as a receiver out of the backfield. I think it has a 0% chance of happening, but it's somewhat interesting to think about.
     
  6. Mar 30, 2012 at 12:37 PM #46
    Dr. Rev Carl Pethos

    Dr. Rev Carl Pethos Spiritual Gynecologist

    Posts:
    1,966
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    take Richardson 9, trade Stewart for a 2/3 pick ---DW-Tolbert-Richardson Goodson to practice squad
     
  7. Mar 30, 2012 at 12:39 PM #47
    buck nasty

    buck nasty Full Access Member

    Posts:
    2,979
    Likes Received:
    4
    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    i don't think goodson can be ps. too many games played.
     
  8. Mar 30, 2012 at 1:11 PM #48
    Dr. Rev Carl Pethos

    Dr. Rev Carl Pethos Spiritual Gynecologist

    Posts:
    1,966
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    forgot about that...would option then be to cut him
     
  9. Mar 30, 2012 at 1:32 PM #49
    Toll Booth Willie

    Toll Booth Willie Welcome to Wusta!

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    3,441
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Des Moines, IA
    Strongly disagree. As good as Richardson is, that would be way too many picks and money sunk into one position. I'll admit, this would still be preferable to Dontari Poe, but I still would not be a fan.
     
  10. Mar 30, 2012 at 5:44 PM #50
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Sure, it would be a great move if they hadn't given a huge contract to DW. But I'm just not seeing a lot of better options if Claiborne doesn't fall (he won't) and they don't like Coples or Reiff.
     
Page 5 of 6

Share This Page