Teebow

Incorrect. I gave him credit last week for a good game. It wasn't great, but he made a good play to win it. Generally, if he did more good, I would say more good things.

I know it'd be hard for you to be able to say you were wrong, but at least you're moving your argument around. I don't like the attention, or the controversiality. I don't know which part of Christianity Tebow is, but I have no problems within the religion, or really outside of it. It's not as if I believe more in John Wesley than John the Baptist, or that I think that people who are sprinkled/dunked are blessed/doomed/whatever.

Even if it were the case, the important thing for people not to forget in this petty little shell game is that it's not as if Tebow is Aaron Rodgers and he somehow has a huge negative following because of his religion. There are legitimate reasons to say he's playing poorly. There are legitimate reasons to question his future pro prospects too - that part I'm not worried about, honestly.

You said he's not accurate (Duh), and you said he is tentative. That's about it. It's an amazing departure from the way you talk about most quarterbacks. Most of your criticism is about the parts around him, the coaching, the opponent, the expectations, anything else. Again, atypical of how you would talk about a non-divisive quarterback.

Abusive and I have both put out more statistics than you. You've done mostly correcting without backing.

And yes, he was awful last week. That's not bashing. It's statistically correct. That may have been the worst quarterbacking in a playoff game without an interception I've ever seen. 34% completion, 126 yards, and couldn't even run the option well. Some of that last part is on the Pats, but still, there were times where the differential was major between the perceived outcome and what he did.

 

lol, your memory is painting a fairly colorful picture. Here is what you actually posted after the Steelers game:

I'm not moving anything or changing anything. You despise Tim Tebow because of his religion. You've made comments proving that. You've called him names and attacked him, specifically saying that you don't like the way he talks about his religion. His faith and his completion percentage are the only two things you ever talk about.

Again, no one here has made the case that Tim Tebow is a great quarterback or great passer. No one. You and Abusive have been attacking the shit out of him, though, and claiming that he's a terrible quarterback. He's not. Both of you are clearly wrong. I think Abusive is making an argument he knows is wrong because it amuses him, while you're doing it because of Tebow's religion.

Holy shit is that such a lie. I've posted numerous statistics backing up my comments about Tebow. I'm the one who pointed out what a hypocrite you were for bashing Tebow's completion percentage while praising Skelton. I'm also the one who pointed out that Eli Manning's completion percentage was awful in his first two seasons. I also posted Tebow's overall QB rating, which you conveniently ignore. I also posted a breakdown of Tebow's statistical performance between the hashes as opposed to outside, and wondered why the Broncos keep having him throw to the outside when he's so much better over the middle. The only statistics you post are his completion percentages, and that goes back to you pretending that completion percentage is "the definition" of what it means to be a good quarterback.

 

Girls girls girls

Give it a rest already

 

tell you what, I'll knock it off. I'm perfectly fine with the what and why on Tebow on my end. Clearly, I only think that 9/26 for 126 and ten points is "bad" instead of "kinda bad" because of his religion, or something, and I don't currently think there's much point in arguing what color brown the shit that was left after Tebow streaked it all over the field. So, someone else let us know what color brown that shitstain was, I'm OK with that.

 

For fuck sake

 

No one is disputing that Tebow played poorly against the Patriots or Chiefs or Bills. The part where you come across as bitchy and biased is when you pretend that he is a terrible quarterback, as if he only has bad games or even has them a majority of the time. You've also made plenty of comments about how you don't like him speaking so much about his religion, and you called him a douchebag after the Steelers victory (which in your mind somehow means praising him).

Your problem is that you look ridiculous when you completely exaggerate Tebow's negatives and ignore the positives. For the third time, no one is trying to paint Tim as one of the league's better quarterbacks. You're the one taking an extreme, unreasonable position and you're clearly doing it because you're offended by his professed faith.

 

Hilarious Jason Whitlock podcast where his barber goes on a 40 minute rant about Tim Tebow. His opinion makes magnus seem like he's Tebow's biggest fan. Well worth a listen. Approximately 35-40 minutes.


Jason And Big Deuce Debate Tim Tebow




http://common.jasonwhitlock.foxsportsradio.com/podcast/19378

 

I don't see more than half his games being "good". and there were more than just three bad ones. You can claim huge bias, I see you as being remarkably defensive. Blahblahblah. Shades of shit.

 

One of Tebow's good games was against the Vikings, who seem to play with 6 men on the field at times.