Teebow

actually, according to my last post, I just said it did matter. Again, Skelton is a relief player, not a starter.

 

I understand why you're making excuses, but it would be nice if you just acknowledged that you were totally hypocritical in praising Skelton while bashing Tebow.

 

I'm not bashing Tebow by saying he's not playing well. I'm not saying that Skelton is worth being a media superstar, I'm not even saying he's playing well. But again, cutting down an also-ran like Skelton to shield Tebow from (oh no) a little criticism is telling.

 

Alright alright, forget I brought up Skelton, just shut the fuck up.

Reggie Bush is also a very good story.

 

Tebow is kinda shitting the bed today. There's a possible scenario where the Orton led Chiefs could win that division in Denver in Week 17. How awesome would that be?

 

Well he has to do that for 3 quarters so he can have the comeback in the 4th.

 

no, I like it. I really enjoy that it's become a question of whether first round pick and two time NCAA champion Tim Tebow is playing better than randomly picked backup player.

 

I'd really surprised if Tebow wasn't in Jacksonville next year.

 

Telling how exactly? You're the one who brought up completion percentage, and you're the one who exposed yourself as a hypocrite by praising Skelton even though his completion percentage is also garbage. You went out of your way to shit on Tebow in this thread, so you have no one to blame but yourself. Playing quarterback is about more than just completion percentage, and Tebow is playing fairly well despite you insisting that he's not and agreeing with Urlacher's idiotic statement that "he's a pretty damn good running back." He didn't throw for 11 touchdown passes in 11 starts by accident, and that's despite having a well below average receiving corps.

 

urlacher said that, pretty funny. you may like him, but he kinda sucks at qb. seems like a nice dude, weird, but nice.