1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Preseason Panthers vs Giants thread

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by SilverSurfer, Aug 13, 2011.

  1. SilverSurfer

    SilverSurfer Son of Anarchy

    Posts:
    25,546
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Welcome, NC
    All sarcasm aside, and from what I've read here and numerous blogs, and along with the NFC South looking mighty tough this year, I think we might have a real shot at 8-8. Maybe better, but after 2-14, go Panthers.
     
  2. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    I would be really happy with 7-9.
     
  3. PaulPaladin

    PaulPaladin Full Access Member

    Posts:
    1,788
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    Location:
    Greenville, SC
    Our 2009 team (12-4) would be 8-8 vs this schedule...
     
  4. SilverSurfer

    SilverSurfer Son of Anarchy

    Posts:
    25,546
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Welcome, NC
    Yep.
     
  5. rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003


    wrong . .. I said most talented, not best. Try being a little more "intellectually honest" there Mary
     
  6. Laceration

    Laceration Full Access Member

    Posts:
    695
    Likes Received:
    7
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    After seeing Clausen's comments about making the bad throw I am willing to concede the decision and let him take the rap for a pretty bad pass. Regardless, if you don't think you can throw it where your guy is going to get it, don't throw it.

    I don't know if we can the financial position can be improved but just thinking about the roster spot, which is really valuable. I would rather have three TEs with different skill sets. I don't really know what Shockey brings that is unique or different and if I'm choosing between Oleson and him...


    Glad you had a good time. It was cool even though it was raining I enjoyed the game.
     
  7. Fan. Attic

    Fan. Attic Upstairs Lurker

    Posts:
    769
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Finally found video of the Pilares TD:

     
  8. presidence99

    presidence99 This MARRIAGE?

    Posts:
    16,537
    Likes Received:
    2,696
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    That music reminds me of hare coursing.
     
  9. Abusive

    Abusive Fuck yo blanket

    Posts:
    11,183
    Likes Received:
    1,542
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    No.
  10. Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Quoted from another thread: "Olsen is a vertical threat who can challenge defenses down the seams, while Shockey would be more of an underneath possession-type option." They're really not that similar overall. Plus you want Shockey's experience and moxie on a team this young. Barnidge had a nice first preseason game and I wouldn't mind carrying four tight ends, but ultimately I don't think he ever develops into something more than a backup, so it's not like keeping him over someone like Shockey helps the future any. Since Chud will use a lot of 2 TE, keeping four is a possibility, although keeping four RBs as well as a hefty dose of LBs & CBs will squeeze the roster.


    That reminded me about how it didn't suck to watch wet cheerleaders in white uniforms on TV. I don't know if they've gotten any prettier, but some definitely got enhancements.
     

Share This Page