1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

If not a QB #1, what do we do for a QB?

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by meatpile, Apr 22, 2011.

Page 6 of 11
  1. Apr 24, 2011 at 7:31 PM #51
    The Special One

    The Special One BALL HARD UNIVERSITY

    Posts:
    1,979
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
  2. Apr 24, 2011 at 9:18 PM #52
    Laceration

    Laceration Full Access Member

    Posts:
    695
    Likes Received:
    7
    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
  3. Apr 25, 2011 at 1:14 AM #53
    magnus

    magnus Chump-proof

    Posts:
    53,697
    Likes Received:
    2
    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    anywhere I lay my head I'm gonna call my home
    really can't be a preseason before labor resolution
     
  4. Apr 25, 2011 at 8:31 AM #54
    rake

    rake Need one of these

    Posts:
    6,712
    Likes Received:
    282
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    my bet is that shit gets resolved but only in time for 2 preseason games
     
  5. Sep 11, 2011 at 10:14 PM #55
    HeadCase

    HeadCase dazed and confused

    Posts:
    3,106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Originally Posted by Collin
    How many fucking times are you going to make me repeat myself? Cam Newton does not have "amazing potential." Cam Newton does not have "amazing potential." Cam Newton does not have "amazing potential." Cam Newton does not have "amazing potential." Cam Newton does not have "amazing potential." He doesn't. Flat out, end of story, period.

    The idea that Newton would "have the most immediate impact and give us our best chance to get to the playoffs next year" is unquestionably wrong. No debate, no opinion, no chance. That's just completely wrong. If you want the team to pick Newton, then it should be for what you think he will become in 3-4 years. If you actually do want someone to provide immediate impact and help the team become competitive, then a rookie QB is the last thing you should want.


    Would now be a good time to revisit the "potential" and "immediate impact" discussion? :winkiss::winkiss::winkiss::winkiss::winkiss:
     
  6. Sep 11, 2011 at 10:18 PM #56
    Ted Striker

    Ted Striker ... over Macho Grande

    Posts:
    913
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    Location:
    Wilson, NC
    Easy buddy, I'm stoked too but it's just one game and we got alot more holes on this team, it appears QB isn't one....so far
     
  7. Sep 11, 2011 at 10:42 PM #57
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    If you want to make a complete ass of yourself, sure, and you usually do.
     
  8. Sep 12, 2011 at 6:07 PM #58
    HeadCase

    HeadCase dazed and confused

    Posts:
    3,106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    :butt:
     
  9. Dec 26, 2011 at 3:56 PM #59
    HeadCase

    HeadCase dazed and confused

    Posts:
    3,106
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    how about now??

    :th_90edab00:
     
  10. Dec 26, 2011 at 4:50 PM #60
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    It's weird that you keep bumping this when Newton didn't get the team to the playoffs.
     
Page 6 of 11

Share This Page