1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Matt Moore/QB's/Field Position/etc.

Discussion in 'Carolina Panthers' started by Abusive, Apr 19, 2011.

Page 3 of 3
  1. Apr 20, 2011 at 2:54 PM #21
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Sanchez was throwing to vastly better receivers, but the QB ratings were similar (63 to 58.4) and the completion percentage was almost identical (53.8 to 52.5). My point is simply that context matters. Clausen on a better team still looks bad, but better. Meanwhile Sanchez is nothing special, at least not yet.
     
  2. Apr 20, 2011 at 3:28 PM #22
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    I am not big on Sanchez and I did not watch him much as a rookie. It just seems like Clausen was really really bad and that no QB on a team that made the playoffs and won a game can be as bad as Clausen was last year.
     
  3. Apr 20, 2011 at 3:32 PM #23
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Clausen was worse, but not by much. That's where your nonsense about the Panthers being a playoff team last season with a solid quarterback missed the mark.
     
  4. Apr 20, 2011 at 4:21 PM #24
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    Just looking back at how good the same basic team looked at the end of 2009 when Moore was playing well it make me think that last year's team could have been good with a solid QB.

    That has sort of been the constant over the past several years. If the good Jake showed up the team was able to win games and make the playoffs. If bad Jake showed up or Jake was out all together then it struggled. Last year was very similar to 2007 in my mind. No chance to win due to inept QB play.
     
  5. Apr 20, 2011 at 6:17 PM #25
    Collin

    Collin soap and water

    Age:
    46
    Posts:
    31,223
    Likes Received:
    451
    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    The problem is that the same players did not play at the same level in 2010 as they did in 2009, and it wasn't due to Clausen. I agree with you that the team should have been better than it was, but a lot of guys played like shit for whatever reason.
     
  6. Apr 20, 2011 at 8:42 PM #26
    Thelt

    Thelt Full Access Member

    Age:
    53
    Posts:
    29,797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Location:
    To the right
    That is true. I kinda wonder if they did not put in as much effort once they saw that Clausen was a deer in the headlights. That and Fox being a lame duck could not have helped anything.
     
  7. Apr 20, 2011 at 9:09 PM #27
    Abusive

    Abusive Fuck yo blanket

    Posts:
    11,183
    Likes Received:
    1,542
    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    Location:
    No.
    ....Plus....that drunk fuck of a coach mailed it in.
     
  8. Apr 21, 2011 at 8:43 AM #28
    GleeHater

    GleeHater non sympathist

    Posts:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011


    This is good stuff. Never liked Grossman either since he will chuck an untimely pick as well as anybody. Concerning Volek, I recently saw where the panthers made a statement (released a while ago) that they were not interested in him. Hope that's just part of their fake interest in a QB @ 1 to lure a trade down.
     
Page 3 of 3

Share This Page