1. This Board Rocks has been moved to a new domain: CarolinaPanthersForum.com

    All member accounts remain the same.

    Most of the content is here, as well. Except that the Preps Forum has been split off to its own board at: http://www.prepsforum.com

    Welcome to the new Carolina Panthers Forum!

    Dismiss Notice

Let's take the UNC athletics scandal and academic fraud....

Discussion in 'College Football Forum' started by gottalaff, Oct 8, 2010.

  1. gottalaff

    gottalaff Smartass

    Posts:
    41,038
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Right behind you
  2. gottalaff

    gottalaff Smartass

    Posts:
    41,038
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Right behind you
    el-owe-el


    :krikkitz:
     
  3. gottalaff

    gottalaff Smartass

    Posts:
    41,038
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Right behind you
    "The University of North Carolina has dismissed student-athlete Marvin Austin from the football program for violations of NCAA agent benefits, preferential treatment and ethical conduct rules. North Carolina based its decision on recent information gathered as part of the joint investigation with the NCAA. Austin’s case was not submitted to the NCAA for reinstatement. A senior from Washington, D.C., Austin had been suspended indefinitely since September 1 for violating team rules."

    ''North Carolina football student-athletes Greg Little and Robert Quinn are permanently ineligible, according to a decision today by the NCAA student-athlete reinstatement staff. The university declared both student-athletes ineligible for violations of NCAA agent benefits, preferential treatment and ethical conduct rules. According to the facts submitted by the university, the total value of the benefits is approximately $4,952 for Little and $5,642 for Quinn.

    Little accepted diamond earrings, as well as travel accommodations for the Bahamas, Washington DC and two trips to Miami, among other benefits. Quinn accepted two black diamond watches, a pair of matching earrings and travel accommodations for a trip to Miami, among other benefits.

    Based upon information gathered by the institution and the NCAA Agent, Gambling and Amateurism staff during its joint investigation, unethical conduct charges were found against both student-athletes for providing false and misleading information. According to the facts submitted by the university, each student-athlete was not truthful during three separate interviews with university and NCAA enforcement staff members. Further, Little and Quinn only provided more accurate information when presented with evidence that was contrary to their assertions.

    When reaching permanent ineligibility for each of the student-athletes, the staff noted the cases included multiple occasions where the student-athletes accepted benefits that were clearly against NCAA rules. The staff also noted that the student-athletes provided false information despite multiple opportunities to correct their assertions.

    During the reinstatement process, NCAA staff reviews each case on its own merits and the specific facts. Staff decisions consider a number of factors including guidelines established by the Division I NCAA Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement for the type of violations and value of benefits, the student-athlete’s responsibility for the violation, as well as any mitigating factors presented by the university.
    When a school discovers a student-athlete has been involved in an NCAA rules violation, it must declare the student-athlete ineligible and may request the student-athlete’s eligibility be reinstated to the NCAA national office staff for consideration. Reinstatement decisions are made independently of any NCAA enforcement process.

    ''The university can appeal the decision to the Committee on Student-Athlete Reinstatement, an independent panel comprised of representatives from NCAA member colleges, universities and athletic conferences. This committee can reduce or remove the condition, but it cannot increase the staff-imposed conditions. If appealed, the student-athlete remains ineligible until the conclusion of the appeals process.''
     
  4. BigVito

    BigVito Splitting Headache

    Age:
    62
    Posts:
    22,728
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    Location:
    Left of Center
    Sorry, it isn't very good. I wish the Dookies cared about football. Their shit talking would be clever at least.
     
  5. gottalaff

    gottalaff Smartass

    Posts:
    41,038
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Right behind you
    I could do better, but I'm not one to pile on. :pet:
     
  6. Village Idiot

    Village Idiot cloud of dust

    Age:
    66
    Posts:
    17,664
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Location:
    Soggy Bottom
    lol
     

    Attached Files:

  7. PantherPaul

    PantherPaul Nap Enthusiasts

    Posts:
    60,058
    Likes Received:
    2,783
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Close to the glow
    Well I expected them never to wear Carolina uniforms but I am glad to hear some sort of resolution. Idiots couldn't wait a few months to bling out.

    Fuck them for embarrassing the University
     
  8. BigVito

    BigVito Splitting Headache

    Age:
    62
    Posts:
    22,728
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    Location:
    Left of Center
    Fuck the University for embarrasing itself.
     
  9. outofstate

    outofstate Full Access Member

    Posts:
    12,357
    Likes Received:
    304
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2003
    So is this it and its over now or is there still more investigation going on?
     
  10. gottalaff

    gottalaff Smartass

    Posts:
    41,038
    Likes Received:
    1,123
    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Location:
    Right behind you
    I read on Statefansnation.com that it is just the tip of the iceberg. :bonk:
     

Share This Page