David Gettis

I'd cut Jarrett right now to keep Gettis on the active. Not saying Jarrett has plaeyed extra poor, but Gettis is a rookie and playing as good (better) than Jarrett, and that's including run blocking. Because of it I keep the younger, cheaper guy that at this point has more upside than even Jarrett.

 

I get the vibe that Jarrett is already gone. I think Moore will start across from Smith and they'll alternate between activating LaFell and Gettis as the 3rd WR (what a terrible WR corps).

 

Nah, I think Jarrett stays. And, it's a shame, because even before the preseason, I had Wright penciled in as my #3 or 4.

 

I thought Gettis looked decent when he got a chance to play. All these guys are going to look better when the defense is trying to stop DW and Stewart while containing Smitty.

 

Fuck you.

 

enjoyed that 9:25 post Abusive, and agree with most. However, share B&B's vibe on Jarrett. If he really did acquire Rosenhaus he sure as hell has not shown that he will be deserving of the kind of mind-boggling contract that Rosencocksucker will demand for his client. I say, that unless jarrett looks like Andre Johnson vs the steelers he might very well be on the way out

 

It would not bother me to see Jarrett cut. He has had his chance and did nothing with it. Lets see what Lafell, Edwards and Gettis can do.

 

so the guy that leads the team in receptions has never played the position of WR, and is tied for 39th in the league

Kenny Moore leads the team in yards at 74, is tied for 80th in the league

really? Terrell Owens was just not a good option?

 

Gettis makes sense to keep, though that spot may be him versus Moore.
89, 80, and 11 are in, and you have to assume 10 as well. We were activating 4 and keeping 6 because of Wright. I have a hard time seeing more than 5 now, and unless some youth takes a real interest in running down kicks maybe 3 active.

 

I think I heard Pat Robertson on the 700 club say something similar.