How embarrassing will it be?

Well, seriously, I hope you win - I haven't watched any of the NIT, but I imagine they probably at least have unbiased commentators. No matter who Duke plays, if Clark Kellogg is calling the game, he'll be pulling against them. It's so blatantly obvious - talk about embarrassing. I thought he was gonna come every time that Baylor guy from Nigeria who could only dunk and couldn't hit a free throw scored.

 

Same refs that called the foul late in the game on Ginyard when the RI player was clearly over Ginyards back and commited the foul.

 

It's kinda funny if you watch the same video, where the RI player behind Graves pushed Graves down/forward towards his RI teammate as Graves was falling.

So it's the which came first, the Chicken or the Egg.

 

RI could of won the game if they just hit free throws. Anyway, if the obvious noncall was called then maybe RI hits those FTs and wins. That's just conjecture though. Chapel Hill won so they moved on to face another
A10 team.

 

Every board has its Thelt, he is Basketball's.

URI probably would have missed both FTs, but they should have had the chance to lose the game again at the line. Most everyone that saw the game agrees that it was odd there was no foul called.

 

Yep............but they blew their NCAA chances before that. Rob just put the last nail in the coffin.

 

clearly in your mind, but you're a UNC homer so your opinion doesn't count. a neutral view says there was a foul on UNC at the end of the game that could have changed the outcome, but it wasn't called.

 

And we all know that you are neutral towards UNC/ACC, right? I don't think I said either way that Graves fouled or didn't. I just pointed out other situations within the same game, where certain "homers" want to bitch about it, because of their neutral feelings towards UNC/ACC, right?

And do you know for a fact that the person who wrote that has a neutral view?

 

Oh Well. We're 67, We're 67, We're 67